It could be a lot worse. They're still on property and it gives Amtrak time to reconsider.
gokeefe
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
Gilbert B Norman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:32 am So let's see:Only 8 have been received. The 69000 and 69001 are still outstanding.
19-20, Crescent, four
50-51, Cardinal, two
NOL one
CHI one
SSY one
Shop one
This assumes all ten B-D's are on the property; that means the delivery of four were not reported on any rail discussion site I review.
twropr wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:46 pm Has anyone seen a Bag-Dorm on the CARDINAL or CRESCENT yet?They've been on the Crescent but aren't programmed for the Cardinal until next month.
Andy
CHTT1 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:41 am Is Amtrak changing the wheel profile on the Amfleets and Horizons? What cars and locomotives have these new profiles?
ApproachMedium wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 2:40 am Were talking about the wheel profile on literally every single passenger car, locomotive, baggage car etc. in america that runs on the amtrak network and possibly anything certified to run on it.It was the NRCC wheel profile vs the APTA profile. The NRCC was profile was designed with higher speeds in mind and differs from the wheel profiles of most other operations. Allow me to post the short version (which is still long:)
<snip>
I think it was actually the FRA who came up with the profile anyhow! But ill look in to that
ThirdRail7 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:07 pmWell, now learning that only eight are on the property, thst pretty well settles The Cardinal matter.Gilbert B Norman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:32 am So let's see:Only 8 have been received. The 69000 and 69001 are still outstanding.
19-20, Crescent, four
50-51, Cardinal, two
NOL one
CHI one
SSY one
Shop one
This assumes all ten B-D's are on the property; that means the delivery of four were not reported on any rail discussion site I review.
twropr wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:46 pm Has anyone seen a Bag-Dorm on the CARDINAL or CRESCENT yet?They've been on the Crescent but aren't programmed for the Cardinal until next month.
Andy
Gilbert B Norman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:02 amWhen a set operates with a bag dorm, the baggage car doesn't operate in the consist. The sleepers remain the same, so you've basically opened up sleeper space by moving the crew to the bag dorm.
Now of interest; has the assigment of Bag-dorms to The Crescent resulted in whacking one Sleeper line or is there now additional Sleeper space available?
Finally, a corollary question. Is a full V-Bag still assigned, or are more nearly new cars off to axle count duties?
ApproachMedium wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:15 pm They should have gotten bag dorms instead of baggage cars in many cases because the baggage cars are almost never fullActually Amtrak originally was going to get 25 but changed 15 to additional baggage. Hind sight is just wonderful isn't it ?
ApproachMedium wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:15 pm They should have gotten bag dorms instead of baggage cars in many cases because the baggage cars are almost never fullThey could always rebuild the diners they wasted money on instead of using them for axle count cars...
USRailFan wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2019 4:53 amThey could always rebuild the diners they wasted money on instead of using them for axle count cars...I think it’s better to build them out into cafe/diner-lite cars with a vastly smaller kitchen. Amtrak will need those eventually, and it would be a much cheaper conversion. (Still expensive of course.)
ApproachMedium wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:15 pm They should have gotten bag dorms instead of baggage cars in many cases because the baggage cars are almost never fullBut of course the issue was that builiding the baggage cars first was a double win at the time: it allowed them to prototype the whole View II fleet with a simple car first, and it allowed them to rush replacments for the old baggage cars into service without having do debug the dorm systems (toilet, interiors, utilites)