Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Discussion related to New York, Susquehanna & Western operations past and present. Also includes some discussion related to Deleware Otsego owned and operated shortlines. Official web site can be found here: NYSW.COM.

Moderators: GOLDEN-ARM, NJ Vike

JoeCollege
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:52 am
Location: Put in the corner by Otto.

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by JoeCollege » Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:59 pm

johnpbarlow wrote:
JoeCollege wrote:
lvrr325 wrote:I'm somewhat surprised they're not running a handful of cars down to Binghamton themselves, although with the engine facility gone there's no need to move power in and out anymore.
I'd think some customers in Utica would have demanded as much, maybe seeking competitive rates from NS connection rather than go CSX to Syracuse and down. And there was speculation that maybe CSX changes would eliminate Utica interchange. Neither seems to have happened, and NYSW has shown little interest from what I can tell in capturing any traffic south of Sangerfield- the old Baillie's traffic that was transloaded at Sherburne now goes container on trucks to Jersey or DeWitt from what I heard.
Is the CSX-NYSW car exchange at Utica an interchange between the two RRs or does NYSW have haulage rights over CSX between Syracuse and Utica? Much earlier in this lengthy thread, someone said CSX-NYSW interchange was at Syracuse and prior to the 2006 embargo of the Utica line, CSX traffic for NYSW customers at Utica was routed Syracuse-Binghamton-Utica. So if Syracuse-Utica via CSX is a haulage agreement, NYSW's Utica customers could theoretically negotiate a Utica-Syracuse-Binghamton to/from NS shipping arrangement today without using the Utica branch.
My understanding is that Utica is an interchange point only.

lvrr325
Posts: 4601
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: New York State

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by lvrr325 » Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:07 am

It is correct that part of the changes after making Syracuse an interchange was all interchange was done there, and they did make some kind of haulage agreement after the line went out of service. The last trip the F45 made was on one of those trains, I happened to see it one night at a crossing in Oneida. What is current on that, no idea.

I want to say that after the move to Syracuse, Conrail made some changes in Utica including eliminating a remote interlocking and the connection to the NYS&W became a hand throw.

But my thought is being able to go to Binghamton opens up interchange for the traffic to go to NS. Even if it can still go there when going haulage rights to Syracuse, I would think it would save at least a day and some expense. And it makes NYS&W look better to run even an occasional train on the line.

ut-1
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:36 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ut-1 » Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:30 pm

This is Operation Lifesaver's nationwide "Rail Safety Week." NYS&W and the Utica PD teamed-up today to further te goals of this noble program.

Here's a link to a one-minute video showing No. 3040 heading through South Utica with two officers up front:

https://youtu.be/cnVtBZt8eCI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Also, a few photos.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ut-1
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:36 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ut-1 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:14 am

This video shows UT-1 performing a run-around maneuver on the new turn-around in South Utica. A bit of street running on Schuyler Street is included for good measure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLWLBi4EY58" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ut-1
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:36 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ut-1 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:32 am

Here are a few photos from UT-1's run to Sangerfield yesterday:

Photo 1: Southbound, Clayville, 9:02 am.

Photo 2: 20 minutes later, passing Durant Farms, Waterville.

Photo 3: A few moments later.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ricky
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:07 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ricky » Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:49 am

It crying shame that line not being use south of sangerfield

milkman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:44 am

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by milkman » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:58 pm

ricky wrote:It crying shame that line not being use south of sangerfield

The restoration was completed a year ago and yet no trains.Go figure.

Rail Trails Fail
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:19 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by Rail Trails Fail » Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:44 pm

milkman wrote:
ricky wrote:It crying shame that line not being use south of sangerfield

The restoration was completed a year ago and yet no trains.Go figure.
At this point without major business agreements in Sherburne and Norwich in the next year or 2, the line is once again headed to a OOS status. Can't see the point in NYSW maintaining it for equipment moves every now and then.

johnpbarlow
Posts: 2116
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:50 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by johnpbarlow » Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:31 am

I don't how accurate and up to date NYS&W's corporate website is but their system map shows the track between Chenango Forks and Sherburne is still out of service. On October 3, 2008, NYS&W filed with the STB stating that service was discontinued on this line segment (last local service was over 5 years earlier and all through traffic has been re-routed) and, as far as I can tell, no further filing has been submitted to the STB by NYS&W to re-instate service on this line segment. So NYS&W doesn't seem that interested in merchandising the availability of the rehabbed track.

https://www.stb.gov/Filings/all_2000s.n ... 223721.PDF

Somewhat related question: for how long has NYS&W had the For Sale sign out for the Utica shops?

http://www.nysw.com/assets/Utica%20Shop%20Flyer.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ricky
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:07 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ricky » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:51 pm

johnpbarlow wrote:I don't how accurate and up to date NYS&W's corporate website is but their system map shows the track between Chenango Forks and Sherburne is still out of service. On October 3, 2008, NYS&W filed with the STB stating that service was discontinued on this line segment (last local service was over 5 years earlier and all through traffic has been re-routed) and, as far as I can tell, no further filing has been submitted to the STB by NYS&W to re-instate service on this line segment. So NYS&W doesn't seem that interested in merchandising the availability of the rehabbed track.

https://www.stb.gov/Filings/all_2000s.n ... 223721.PDF

Somewhat related question: for how long has NYS&W had the For Sale sign out for the Utica shops?

http://www.nysw.com/assets/Utica%20Shop%20Flyer.pdf
it boil down to nysw does not care at all about the line from sheburne to chenango froks at all its crying shame

milkman
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:44 am

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by milkman » Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:44 pm

http://www.nysw.com/assets/Utica%20Shop%20Flyer.pdf[/quote] it boil down to nysw does not care at all about the line from sheburne to chenango froks at all its crying shame[/quote]

My wife saw a group of 3 maintenance vehicles going up the tracks by our house in Norwich today.
I still have hope something will happen and we will see trains on a regular basis again.

ricky
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:07 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ricky » Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:39 pm

I just wondering if train went threw Norwich yesterday or today?

ut-1
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:36 pm

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by ut-1 » Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:54 am

Here is a video showing UT-1 northbound on Schuyler just before sunset under snowy conditions on Jan 18th:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryVEQyNXrKM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

NYS&W142Fan
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NJ

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by NYS&W142Fan » Sat Jan 20, 2018 5:37 pm

A Jordan Spreader ahead of the Loco would help "clear" things up a bit! It's amazing just how dumb people can be at times.

JoeCollege
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:52 am
Location: Put in the corner by Otto.

Re: Utica Branch Discussion Thread

Post by JoeCollege » Mon Jan 22, 2018 3:30 pm

It must have been something to watch the big EL trains and PC detours make that move.

Return to “New York, Susquehanna & Western - Past and Present”