Waterbury Branch: Improvements, PTC, Sidings, Service Frequency

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith

Noel Weaver
Posts: 9630
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by Noel Weaver »

i ran one or two detours over the Maybrook Line via Stevenson and although it worked, it took a lot of time, involved single track and a couple of extra trains will cause a lot of congestion. It is slow running as well. It could improve but it will take plenty of dollars that Connecticut does not have as well as time.
Waterbury on the other hand could and probqbly should have a couple of through trains to and from New York. I think a couple of through trains would boost the ridership on this entire line. There is enough population between Derby and Waterbury to support more and better service and there are enough reasons for a one day trip to New York as well. There is not much in Bridgeport for anybody to go to but New York has lots to do.
Noel Weaver

njt/mnrrbuff
Posts: 3611
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by njt/mnrrbuff »

I'm not too surprised if the Maybrook Line is very slow. Several years from now, it might be a good line to run a suburb to suburb rail service, even a route maybe running between Harford and Danbury.

As for the Waterbury Branch, and in fact, with the diesel branches of MNR in general, yes, running locomotive hauled trains on the shuttles might be a waste. Running DMUs is the answer. Many of the stops on the Waterbury Branch are relatively close to each other. The same with the Danbury. It seems that single level DMUs might be able to handle the grades on the Danbury Branch. As for the through trains on the Waterbury Branch, it would be nice to have that service return. Three each way during the rush hour might be stretching it a little too far but I could see maybe starting out with two each way.

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22355
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by DutchRailnut »

more advise from the unknowing ... really..
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Backshophoss
Posts: 6456
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by Backshophoss »

MN has plenty of experience with RDC's and the SPV's in the past,then figured out it was better off with the "mini" push pull sets for the
branch "shuttle" services,along with the Harmon-Poughkeepsie,and Brewster North("Southeast")-Wassaic off peak services.
The Devon-Bridgeport-East Bridgeport Yard and return moves are the waste,time to bring back Devon as a station/transfer point.
The Land of Enchantment is not Flyover country!

User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by GirlOnTheTrain »

They haven't used SLE sets since the crew base moved to Stamford.
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail

twropr
Posts: 699
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:26 pm

Waterbury Branch Upgrades

Post by twropr »

I read that Metro-North has been installing welded rail on the Waterbury Branch. Are there plans to install CTC (and ultimately PTC) on this line?
Andy

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22355
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: Waterbury Branch Upgrades

Post by DutchRailnut »

It has had welded rail since early 90's, no stick rail anywhere on MN other than Beacon line.
even yards are welded rail.
Yes even Waterbury branch is getting PTC as per FRA mandate.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8634
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by Jeff Smith »

theseaandalifesaver wrote:SNIP... i'm honestly surprised MN still runs to Waterbury.
Lord knows they've tried to shut it down in the past.

I would agree on the mini's, except for the fact that they break down an awful lot and need to be replaced anyway. CtDOT's going to have to pony up for their replacements, and they may well decide to go a different direction than MNRR, even though they currently pool equipment, as they search for Hartford Line and SLE equipment. Maybe three cars isn't a waste on the Danbury, but it is on Waterbury.

The main thing, as Backshophoss says, is to make a Devon Transfer permanent, and eliminate Bridgeport as a transfer. Or, to do that, you could run a thru semi-express down to SoNo and a pocket track (this could work for turns to Danbury, too). Or Stamford. Hell, while we're at it, why not New Haven? That would be perfect for the PacMan theme CtDOT is running now on its Hartford/SLE.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8634
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: Waterbury Branch Improvements: PTC, Sidings, Service

Post by Jeff Smith »

GirlOnTheTrain wrote:They haven't used SLE sets since the crew base moved to Stamford.
I think the one time I was up there a few years back, I caught the SLE set in Waterbury. Now it's PacMan, maybe CtDOT should have MNRR run a through train from Waterbury via Devon to New Haven or New London?
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: CDOT Rail Fleet

Post by GirlOnTheTrain »

Rode DMUs (Class 156) in Scotland, all the way from Mallaig to Glasgow (175 miles or so) on the West Highland line. Sat there thinking "these would be nice on the Waterbury branch but this will never happen."

They also had been recently redone, so I was surprised to learn they were as old as I am!
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail

njt/mnrrbuff
Posts: 3611
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: CDOT Rail Fleet

Post by njt/mnrrbuff »

Yes I remember MNR and CDOT using SPV cars when they could run under their own power and they were unreliable. That was a major turnoff for many people, especially the Waterbury Branch passengers. Today, the Waterbury Branch passengers still continue to get forgotten and hopefully when the new equipment rolls on the branch, passengers will be happy.

User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: CDOT Rail Fleet

Post by GirlOnTheTrain »

njt/mnrrbuff wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2020 4:28 pm
Yes I remember MNR and CDOT using SPV cars when they could run under their own power and they were unreliable. That was a major turnoff for many people, especially the Waterbury Branch passengers. Today, the Waterbury Branch passengers still continue to get forgotten and hopefully when the new equipment rolls on the branch, passengers will be happy.
Equipment is not the Waterbury's problem. Craptastic frequency is.
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail

njt/mnrrbuff
Posts: 3611
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: CDOT Rail Fleet

Post by njt/mnrrbuff »

I have had hit or miss experiences with the cleanliness of the equipment on the Waterbury Branch but I haven't ridden it in just under a decade. Yes, it would be great if the branch had those sidings which would enable more frequencies. Of course, hopefully enough equipment would be ordered when expanded operations on the Waterbury Branch happens.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8634
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: Waterbury Branch: Improvements, PTC, Sidings, Service Frequency

Post by Jeff Smith »

So with the RFI (CDOT RFI for "Service ready" cars (was: CDOT Rail Fleet), specifically for the Waterbury Branch and Hartford Line (https://biznet.ct.gov/SCP_Documents/Bid ... _FINAL.pdf, I thought I'd resurrect this topic.
The leased trailer and/or control coaches are for potential use in passenger rail service in Connecticut and into Massachusetts, including on the Waterbury Branch Line (Stratford to Waterbury, CT) and/or Hartford Line service (New Haven, CT to Springfield, MA).
I find the phraseology interesting. First, they are limiting the potential area of operation to Waterbury and Hartford. Including Hartford would seem to limit those from pool service, much as the SLE fleet is not available for pool service, even if operated west of New Haven by MNRR. Yet, Waterbury IS included in pool service.

They also specify Stratford, and not Bridgeport.

My opinion has always been that Waterbury service should be truncated to a permanent Devon Transfer station (see: New Haven Line Devon Transfer Station to Waterbury, nothing expensive or elaborate, transfer only with platforms on the wye and each side of the main line with an overpass. This would also provide transfer opportunities in both east and west directions.

It seems to me that Waterbury, if reduced to this type of operation, can be withdrawn from the MNRR agreement and potentially put out to bid. The cars needn't be pooled anymore in that case. I could even envision a passenger service east of Waterbury to Hartford.

I wonder if Mr. Guillietti is thinking the same thing.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”