Do you like the MBTA's new switcher or the 1921?

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Which livery do you prefer?

Poll ended at Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:36 pm

MBTA # 1921 in old B&M livery
14
67%
MBTA # 3247 in current MBTA color scheme
7
33%
 
Total votes: 21

CSX Conductor
Posts: 5458
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:04 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Do you like the MBTA's new switcher or the 1921?

Post by CSX Conductor » Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:36 pm

Just curios, I understand that the paint scheme of the newly acquired #3247 is more uniform, but how many of you like the old B&M paint scheme on the #1921 better?

[/img]http://photos.nerail.org/photos/lowres/ ... 125457.jpg

Stephen
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 10:29 am

Post by Stephen » Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:43 pm

I like both. They are certainly a lot better than 902 & 904.
The only problem with 3247 is that it will be tougher to pick out in the crowd at the BET...
- Stephen

octr202
Posts: 4156
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:13 am
Location: In the land of the once and future 73 trackless trolley.

Post by octr202 » Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:31 pm

I'll admit to liking 3247...but then I always liked the Atlantic Coast Line :wink:

Too bad it came at the expense of the "B&M" unit.
Wondering if I'll see the Haverhill double-tracking finished before I retire...
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010

MBTA F40PH-2C 1050
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:57 pm

Post by MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 » Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:16 pm

i like the B&M style better, but this scheme is right on its heels, i like this new paint scheme :-D

kwf
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Belmont Ma.

Post by kwf » Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:41 pm

I like the looks of the "new" unit, though I would rather see throw-back schemes on the MoW units.

efin98

Post by efin98 » Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:10 pm

I think it's good the MBTA went with their own scheme variation for the switcher. It looks great and considering how much of a role it plays in the daily operations of the MBTA Commuter Rail operations it should look similar to the other engines. 902 and 904 could use a new scheme but they could wait for a while.

CSX Conductor
Posts: 5458
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:04 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Post by CSX Conductor » Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:24 pm

I do agree that it should be uniform with the rest of the revenue roster, but I also thought the 1921 looked pretty sharp.

SnoozerZ49
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:25 am

Post by SnoozerZ49 » Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:56 pm

At least it will blend in with the train sets as its most frequent duty will probably be to rescue the junk that goes out on the road.

User avatar
ST214
Posts: 1493
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Cleveland Heights, OH

Post by ST214 » Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:36 pm

She'll look good lugging around dead GP40MC's, since that will mostlikely be her most common action.
Hoping for a rebirth of the Screamer fleet.

CRail
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Post by CRail » Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:39 am

I simply liked having 1921 in the minuteman scheme simply because it was preserving history. The new one , i think, should have been restored.

Heres csx's photo.
CSX Conductor wrote: Image
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).

kwf
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Belmont Ma.

a daylight pic...

Post by kwf » Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:06 am

http://photos.nerail.org/showpic/?photo ... bydate%3A1


I don't like the number below the cab window...

CSX Conductor
Posts: 5458
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:04 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Post by CSX Conductor » Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:43 am

Thanks Corey, but it is not 'my' picture. Not sure what I did to screw the link up, but thanks again for gettin it correct.

KWF, I agree that the munber would probably look bettet on the panel doors like the rest of the MBTA's roster, but hey, since it is under the window that might help distinguish it from the rest of the revenue fleet. :wink:

CSX Conductor
Posts: 5458
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:04 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Post by CSX Conductor » Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:45 am

BTW, has the 3247 been outfitted with A.C.S.E.S. equipment yet for service on the South Side?

GP40MC 1116
Posts: 2073
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 9:38 pm

MBTA Switchers

Post by GP40MC 1116 » Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:08 pm

I think they did a good job on 3247. So now what does this leave us 902, 904, 1921 and the new 3247. And what is the real story on 1921? can't they fix it or is it still in service? ALso does the MBTA keep a switcher on the south side or does Amtrak handle that for us

CSX Conductor
Posts: 5458
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:04 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Post by CSX Conductor » Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:20 pm

I haven't heard anything lately on the 1921, other than what has been posted here on the last thread about the 1921.

As for South Side service, the MBTA has a non-revenue engine for rescue service. This was the 1921's duty, but I believe it was replaced by the 902. The assignment is referred to as the "Readville Switcher", because it is based out of the MBTA's Readville Facility. Normally it switches out cars and locomotives in Readville and takes them over to the B.E.T., along with any equipment in SouthHampton Street that needs to go to B.E.T.

As I mentioned earlier, it is also on-call during the day for rescue service in the event of a disabled train.

Basically MBTA takes care of rescuing their own trains on the NEC, and Amtrak does their's. (The most that they will do is put Amtrak passengers on an MBTA train to Boston if Amtrak dies, and vice-versa). But the equipment usually stays put for the rescue unit. :wink:

Return to “Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)”