Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

WatertownCarBarn
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 8:56 am

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by WatertownCarBarn » Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:12 pm

Behind the MIT ROTC building (between Pacific and Vassar) the is an at grade pedestrian crossing of the GJ. Fairly well trafficed and lit.

User avatar
BostonUrbEx
Posts: 3835
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Winn to MPT 8, Boston to MPN 38, and Hat to Bank

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by BostonUrbEx » Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:29 pm

GP40MC1118 wrote:B721 runs Sunday through Thursday. OD 130PM Framingham. . . .
Great info here. About what time do they look to leave Everett, and what time through Swift on the return? Or is it too wildly variable?

GP40MC1118
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by GP40MC1118 » Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:54 pm

It's somewhat variable.

Thursday they were very early coming back, right after the rush hour parade.

Most of the time its anytime after 930PM-1030PM coming back.

D

130MM
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 1:57 pm
Location: Wakefield, MA

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by 130MM » Mon Jul 20, 2015 11:54 am

GP40MC1118 wrote:Given the current track throws necessitated by the GLX extension to Union Square, any redesign to
make a direct GJ connection to the FRML problematic.
D
Apparently, nobody here has seen the plans for the "new" Swift. The connection to the GJ will be a realigned track crossing the FML #2 on a moveable point frog, and connecting to the FML #1 with a standard #10 turnout(a la Beverly Jct - albeit with a smaller turnout). I've got the plans upstairs, if you want to see them, D.

DAW

GP40MC1118
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by GP40MC1118 » Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:17 pm

Sure DW....I heard about this disaster of epic proportions...

D

User avatar
BostonUrbEx
Posts: 3835
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Winn to MPT 8, Boston to MPN 38, and Hat to Bank

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by BostonUrbEx » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:40 pm

I keep hearing about this impending 'disaster' that will be a movable point frog at Swift. Is the one in Beverly really unreliable and terrible?

sery2831
Posts: 5138
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Manchester, NH

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by sery2831 » Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:45 am

130MM wrote:
GP40MC1118 wrote:Given the current track throws necessitated by the GLX extension to Union Square, any redesign to
make a direct GJ connection to the FRML problematic.
D
Apparently, nobody here has seen the plans for the "new" Swift. The connection to the GJ will be a realigned track crossing the FML #2 on a moveable point frog, and connecting to the FML #1 with a standard #10 turnout(a la Beverly Jct - albeit with a smaller turnout). I've got the plans upstairs, if you want to see them, D.

DAW
Will this only lead to Tower A on the number one? Will you have to reverse West towards Porter(shuffle) to continue on the Grand Junction? Or is the switching lead on the west end of BET being reconfigured as well?
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

GP40MC1118
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by GP40MC1118 » Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:38 pm

Moveable point frogs are fine when the work, but a royal pain when they don't. At one
point, there was a directive requiring C&S personnel only to handthrow it when a failure
occurred. Never liked them and needlessly complicates things. A diamond with a single
power switch for No.2 Track would've sufficed.

As for the Swift caper, having not seen a recent rendering of plan, I understood that, by
example, for CSX to get off the GJ to the 4th Iron, would require coming across the
switching lead for BET. Duh...

D

User avatar
BandA
Posts: 2860
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by BandA » Tue Jul 21, 2015 11:25 pm

If the frog croaks, just blame Keolis :wink:

sery2831
Posts: 5138
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Manchester, NH

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by sery2831 » Wed Jul 22, 2015 1:40 am

GP40MC1118 wrote:
As for the Swift caper, having not seen a recent rendering of plan, I understood that, by
example, for CSX to get off the GJ to the 4th Iron, would require coming across the
switching lead for BET. Duh...

D
So the switching lead gets connected to the Fitchburg? There isn't a whole lot of room to play with there. They will have to install more derails in BET. As the entire yard is downhill going west.
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

User avatar
BostonUrbEx
Posts: 3835
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Winn to MPT 8, Boston to MPN 38, and Hat to Bank

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by BostonUrbEx » Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:31 am

So what benefit does a movable frog point have versus a standard diamond? Higher speeds/smoother ride?

MBTA3247
Posts: 2740
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:01 pm
Location: Milton

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by MBTA3247 » Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:24 am

Yes, along with vastly less wear to the rails. Though I've never heard of a diamond with movable point frogs, just regular turnouts.
"The destination of this train is [BEEP BEEP]" -announcement on an Ashmont train.

butts260
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:04 pm
Location: Rockport, MA

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by butts260 » Wed Jul 22, 2015 12:26 pm

On the Eastern Rt. doesn't the diamond at Beverly Junction, where the Gloucester Branch joins, have moveable point frogs?

typesix
Posts: 674
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Boston

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by typesix » Wed Jul 22, 2015 12:46 pm

BostonUrbEx wrote:So what benefit does a movable frog point have versus a standard diamond? Higher speeds/smoother ride?
Also less noise.

ExCon90
Posts: 4502
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:22 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Post by ExCon90 » Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:27 pm

MBTA3247 wrote:Yes, along with vastly less wear to the rails. Though I've never heard of a diamond with movable point frogs, just regular turnouts.
The Reading had a lot of them, and some still remain. They were fond of British-style double-track junctions with two turnouts and one diamond, and the diamonds mostly had movable-point frogs. There's one at CARMEL, where the Warminster line diverges from Lansdale-Doylestown, and I think the ones at 16th St. Junction, where the Norristown trains diverge, have movable-point frogs. The one at Jenkintown was recently removed and replaced by standard turnouts.

Return to “Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)”