I wasn't even thinking of New York. We're talking about a route that could link the Texas metropolises with New Orleans, Birmingham, Atlanta, Charlotte, and only then the North East Corridor, if it were structured to do so - so many of the most important cities of the South all in a fork.
While New Orleans certainly punches above it's weight as a travel destination thanks to tourism demand, if we were designing a rail system today would we really make the southern hub an urbanized area of less than a million when there's an urban area of nearly five million a relatively short way's down the tracks?
I understand that the rails go where the rails go and the logistical infrastructure is where it is, but I can't help but wonder if New Orleans is really the best place to be turning trains. I also realize we're talking about long distance trains here - not exactly key components of any transportation system and not really worth all that much trouble over. It's interesting to consider nonetheless.
While New Orleans certainly punches above it's weight as a travel destination thanks to tourism demand, if we were designing a rail system today would we really make the southern hub an urbanized area of less than a million when there's an urban area of nearly five million a relatively short way's down the tracks?
I understand that the rails go where the rails go and the logistical infrastructure is where it is, but I can't help but wonder if New Orleans is really the best place to be turning trains. I also realize we're talking about long distance trains here - not exactly key components of any transportation system and not really worth all that much trouble over. It's interesting to consider nonetheless.
B. Dawe's map of routes and urban populations https://brendandawe.carto.com/viz/80b9d ... /embed_map" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; NOW updated with 2016 Canadian Populations