Illinois Amtrak Service

Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, Amtrak67 of America, Tadman, gprimr1

CHTT1
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by CHTT1 » Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:20 pm

Now that the voters of Illinois have kicked out Bruce Rauner, perhaps the Rockford train proposals will be revived. Hopefully, new governor J.B. Pritzker will get IDOT to complete the Chicago-St. Louis high speed project.

User avatar
Rockingham Racer
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:25 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Rockingham Racer » Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:53 am

Anybody know how much "noise" the Rockford area has been making over the return of service?

Station Aficionado
Posts: 1766
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Station Aficionado » Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:25 pm

CHTT1 wrote:Now that the voters of Illinois have kicked out Bruce Rauner, perhaps the Rockford train proposals will be revived. Hopefully, new governor J.B. Pritzker will get IDOT to complete the Chicago-St. Louis high speed project.
Of perhaps more immediate interest, will the Quad Cities service move closer to reality? I believe the Moline station is complete, but trackwork on IAIS needs to be done, along with the connection to BNSF at Wyanet.

Roadgeek Adam
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:01 am
Location: Somewhere in Western New York

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Roadgeek Adam » Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:26 pm

Don't forget Geneseo station. Regardless, I'd prioritize the nearly finished Moline service.
...they are solid plastic, so don't settle for imitation.

Anthony
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:29 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Anthony » Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:28 pm

Roadgeek Adam wrote:Don't forget Geneseo station. Regardless, I'd prioritize the nearly finished Moline service.
Yes, and after the Quad Cities service is operational, THEN the state can focus on bringing service to Rockford. The advisory referendum showing support for passenger rail service to Rockford passed with flying colors - almost 80% voted "YES" on it. So that tells the state that Rockford badly wants service. Governor-elect JB Pritzker says that he'll seek federal funds to pay for the majority of the capital startup costs of a Rockford service.

eolesen
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:01 am

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by eolesen » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:35 am

Illinois can't even properly fund Metra, so what makes anyone think they'd be able to start something new to Rockford and Dubuque?...

Best bet would have been to cut a deal with Metra to extend service beyond Big Timber on the UP to Rockford, but that will never happen due to the politics involved.

ryanch
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:42 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by ryanch » Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:51 pm

On the Quad Cities and Rockford/Dubuque services, ask and you shall receive:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/col ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Receive news, that is. You're not going to receive the new services any time soon.

Station Aficionado
Posts: 1766
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Station Aficionado » Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:26 pm

ryanch wrote:On the Quad Cities and Rockford/Dubuque services, ask and you shall receive:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/col ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Receive news, that is. You're not going to receive the new services any time soon.
Well, good to know that folks are still thinking about these services. Nothing will happen before Pritzker gets his team in place, but suspect the lobbying has begun.

F40CFan
Posts: 1419
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:26 am
Location: CMStP&P RR D&I Sub. MP 19

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by F40CFan » Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:13 pm

CHTT1 wrote:Now that the voters of Illinois have kicked out Bruce Rauner, perhaps the Rockford train proposals will be revived. Hopefully, new governor J.B. Pritzker will get IDOT to complete the Chicago-St. Louis high speed project.
Don't hold your breath. Madigan's minions have had a veto-proof majority for ages and you can see what has gotten done. Having his "boy" in the governor's mansion will just help him bankrupt the state further.
"No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously."

CHTT1
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by CHTT1 » Mon Nov 19, 2018 7:58 pm

Why would Madigan oppose rail improvements? Illinois runs a lot of state-subsidized trains. He obviously hasn't opposed them in the past. Rauner tried to blame all the state's problems on Madigan (who has way too much power and needs to retire), but Rauner's "my way or the highway" approach to government didn't work.

eolesen
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:01 am

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by eolesen » Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:44 pm

Madigan could have approved funding for the Quinn announced Amtrak routes at any time during Rauner's tenure.

He didn't.

ILL has a spending problem and a liability problem. Those issues have to be addressed before anything Jumbo campaigned on can be fulfilled, and he's already promised money to education, Medicare, roads and bridges.

No mention of trains, nor do I expect there to be other than Metra.

The reality is that Jumbo only has to keep Chicago happy in order to get re-elected. The Quad Cities and Rockford won't get any attention until his re-election campaign fires up.

F40CFan
Posts: 1419
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:26 am
Location: CMStP&P RR D&I Sub. MP 19

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by F40CFan » Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:08 pm

Well put, thank you.

I just rode the Lincoln Service to St. Louis and back to see a hockey game. Went Business Class. Very nice. I still don't understand why they didn't keep the 110 mph segment in operation. Oh well, maybe some day.
"No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously."

User avatar
Matt Johnson
Posts: 4208
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Hazlet, NJ

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Matt Johnson » Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:53 pm

http://www.nprillinois.org/post/vision- ... s#stream/0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

“The goal is to get the trains from 80 miles per hour, increased to 90 miles per hour.”

Hmm, no mention of 110 mph.

CHTT1
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by CHTT1 » Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:18 pm

eolesen wrote:Madigan could have approved funding for the Quinn announced Amtrak routes at any time during Rauner's tenure.

He didn't.

ILL has a spending problem and a liability problem. Those issues have to be addressed before anything Jumbo campaigned on can be fulfilled, and he's already promised money to education, Medicare, roads and bridges.

No mention of trains, nor do I expect there to be other than Metra.

The reality is that Jumbo only has to keep Chicago happy in order to get re-elected. The Quad Cities and Rockford won't get any attention until his re-election campaign fires up.
"Jumbo" Very classy, eolesen. Nothing like bring a discussion down to the gutter.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8512
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: MP 67.2 Georgia Southern Railway

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Post by Jeff Smith » Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:39 am

ADMIN: We tend to use derisive names for politicians we don’t like for whatever reason we don’t like them. I generally disregard, but before it goes any farther here, let’s leave such further usage on the sidelines please.
Next stop, Willoughby
~Jeff Smith (fka "Sarge") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

Return to “Amtrak”