Railroad Forums 

  • Two new Alcos coming to the LAL.

  • Discussion pertaining to the past and present operations of the LAL, the WNYP, and the B&H. Official site: LALRR.COM.
Discussion pertaining to the past and present operations of the LAL, the WNYP, and the B&H. Official site: LALRR.COM.

Moderator: Luther Brefo

 #1286545  by scottychaos
 
All five of the Tioga Central Alcos in Wellsboro PA have been purchased by the Livonia Avon & Lakeville.
RS3m No. 506 and S2 No. 14 are planned to operate.
the three RS1's are in bad shape, and were purchased for parts. they will be parted out and scrapped.

Scot
 #1286625  by DutchRailnut
 
506 is a RS3u and not a RS3m.
 #1286639  by scottychaos
 
DutchRailnut wrote:506 is a RS3u and not a RS3m.
maybe..maybe not.
there are actual D&H written records that say RS3m, and the D&H itself put RS3m on the repainted 502:

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPi ... id=3720714" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

no one is really sure where RS3u came from, but it is likely just railfan misinformation.
Its also possible the D&H did use RS3u at one time, perhaps very early on, but I am not aware of any documentation to support this.
We do have actual D&H support for RS3m, written roster data from the railroad itself, and the actual 502 marked as a RS3m by the D&H,
but there is no known actual support for RS3u..it is IMO most likely a railfan myth.

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dan ... pics/61837" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Scot
Last edited by scottychaos on Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 #1286642  by scottychaos
 
and Tioga Central says....RS3u! :P

https://web.archive.org/web/20110717063 ... ipment.cfm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

fascinating..
So it seems officially, there is evidence for both.
D&H did say RS3m on at least one unit, photos prove it..there are no known D&H records for RS3u, but someome might be able to dig them up..

Tioga Central officially said RS3u..
I wonder what LAL will call it?

Scot
 #1286761  by Alcoman
 
Consider what the letters mean: " M" means modified and "U " means upgraded. In this case, it was both. However, these D&H units were rebuilt by Morrison-Knudsen and given an UPGRADED horsepower from 1600 to 2000 hp, A 12-251 engine and they reworked the TM blower system which amounts to an UPGRADE. Like the D&M units, they were given the letter "U" to signify an UPGRADE regardless how the railroad labeled them. In Dick Steinbrenners book, they are referred to RS-3u in all references.
 #1286771  by scottychaos
 
Alcoman wrote:Consider what the letters mean: " M" means modified and "U " means upgraded. In this case, it was both. However, these D&H units were rebuilt by Morrison-Knudsen and given an UPGRADED horsepower from 1600 to 2000 hp, A 12-251 engine and they reworked the TM blower system which amounts to an UPGRADE. Like the D&M units, they were given the letter "U" to signify an UPGRADE regardless how the railroad labeled them. In Dick Steinbrenners book, they are referred to RS-3u in all references.
Good definations, and that all makes sense, except for this part:
Like the D&M units, they were given the letter "U" to signify an UPGRADE regardless how the railroad labeled them.
Regardless of how the railroad labeled them? the railroad is, IMO, the only entity with the authority to call them anything! ;)
(and given the letter "U" by who? that is the question..)
I suppose we could include MK too as an official naming entity.
So MK, and the D&H, have the authority to call them *something*..The definitions of "upgraded" and "modified" are really irrelevant IMO..
Some railroad rebuild locomotives and give them an m, some a u, some a Dash-2 designation, some say Dash-3.
The D&H Alco PA's came back from rebuilding with the designation PA-4.
Railroads are basically free to choose anything they like..the only "official" designation is what the railroad or rebuilder chooses to use.

So we still have nothing official from the D&H concerning RS3u.
current list of sources:

RS3m evidence:
1. D&H paper records that say RS3m, from the poster in the yahoo discussion linked above.
2. The actual D&H 502 clearly labeled RS3M by the D&H itself.
3. D&H classification for "regular" RS3's was ARS-20. D&H classification for the rebuilds was ARS-20m.

RS3u evidence:
1. The Tioga Central Railroad has actually called the 506 a RS3u while it has been in their possession.
2. The book "The American Locomotive Company: A Centennial Remembrance" by Richard T. Steinbrenner (2003) says RS3u in all instances.

The case for RS3m is still a runaway winner.
No known, yet, factual proof to support RS3u from the D&H or MK.
MK called them TE56-4A, which supports neither m or u.

thanks,
Scot
 #1286888  by traingeek8223
 
This is being over thought. "Railfan" terminology states a locomotive rebuilt with other then the original manufacturer's components gets a "m" designation and a locomotive rebuilt with more modern components resulting in a significant change from original, from the original manufacturer, get a "u" designation. Note I said "railfan". Railroad's can call them anything they want (Reading called their RS3s RS1s). Railfans set the terminology on most early locomotive models. ALCO originally referred to RS3s simply as "1600 Horsepower Road Switcher". When rebuilt, Morrison Knudsen called them TE-56-4s.
 #1286895  by traingeek8223
 
Back to the original point of topic: Great news indeed that two of these locomotives will see future service! Too bad about the RS1s, though I certainly understand. Wonder if there are enough good wheel sets among them to get LA&L 20 back on the road? Too bad there isn't a group out there that could save the shell of NYS&W 240.
 #1286936  by DutchRailnut
 
a RS3m is Conrail designation for EMD re-engine units with a 12/567 in them.
RS3u is upgrade where a RS3 is upgraded with newer ALCO components including prime mover.
 #1286946  by traingeek8223
 
The C&NW RS3 rebuilds should fall into the RS3u category as they are rebuilt with newer ALCO components.
 #1287192  by Alcoman
 
Benjamin Maggi wrote:Is the Tioga Central replacing the Alcos with different engines, or closing down?
I did see something recently posted on FB that the W&C are getting 2 F-7's to use in the tourist train. (NOT Confirmed) Makes sense even as I prefer a pair of FPA-4's which are also available.

At least the ALCO's will be given a new home and the parts will extend the life of 2 others...
 #1287406  by mandealco
 
Hi
Maybe we will get to see something like this on the WNY&P. They do have an important link to the D&H, and this would look very cool.
The photo is my N-scale kitbash from over 25 years ago.
Image
Cheers
Steve