2008 New York Ontario & Western Poster

ForumsPhotosEventsRailroad.net MerchandiseContact Us

SELECTED ON-TIME PERFORMANCE 11/29/06 THROUGH 12/28/06

Discussion related to the National Railroad Passenger Corp. This forum is not affiliated with or endorsed by Amtrak/NRPC in any way. Official site: AMTRAK.COM

Moderators: Otto Vondrak, pablo, Tadman

SELECTED ON-TIME PERFORMANCE 11/29/06 THROUGH 12/28/06

Postby shlustig on Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:17 pm

Results for this period are:

TOTAL TRAINS = 1057

ON TIME = 274 (26%)

LATE = 783 (74%)

AVERAGE DELAY = 55"

Only scheduled arrival times were used; no "grace" period was allowed.

Of the late trains:

350 (45%) were 29" or less late;
173 (22%) were 30" to 59" late;
149 (19%) were 1' to 2' late;
95 (12%) were more than 2' late; and
16 (2%) had no arrival times shown.

BY ROUTE, WITH O.T.% AND AVG. DELAY:

CAPITOL LIMITED
#29 - 13% - 1' 10"
#30 - 10% - 1' 44"

CARDINAL
#51 - 23% - 44"
#50 - 25% - 2' 11"

PENNSYLVANIAN
#43 - 38% - 40"
(E) - 45% - 19"

LAKE SHORE LIMITED
#49 - 17% - 1' 25"
#48 - 0% - 1' 37"

LAKE SHORE LIMITED (BOSTON / ALBANY)
#449 - 72% - 17"
#448 - 21% - 1' 41"

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS
#59 - 83% - 50"
#58 - 46% - 30"

CRESCENT
#19 - 3% - 1' 35"
#20 - 40% - 1' 14"

DETROIT CORRIDOR
(W) - 29% -34"
(E) - 11% - 34"

ST. LOUIS CORRIDOR
(W) - 14% - 51"
(E) - 19% - 58"

SYRACUSE CORRIDOR
(W) - 37% - 25"
(E) - 27% - 1' 00"


The total number of trains was reduced due to the severe weather which disrupted the St. Louis Corridor. However, despite the slow recovery for this route, the on-time performance for all services monitored rose from 17% to 26% with only a 4" increase in the average delay. 67% of the late trains were less than 1' late, while the number of trains more than 1' late declined from 276 to 244.

Services which improved in both categories include the westbound Capitol Limited, Cardinal, and Lake Shore Limited; eastbound Pennsylvanian; southbound City of New Orleans; and both directions of the Boston connection of the Lake Shore Limited and of the Detroit Corridor.

The only service to lose ground in both categories was the westbound Pennsylvanian, something that is hard to understand considering the 45"+ of padding between Altoona and Pittsburgh.

The trains with the fewest on-time arrivals other than the Lake Shore Limited were #21 (westbound Texas Eagle) of the St. Louis Corridor and #352 of the eastbound Detroit Corridor with 1 each, and #352 of the eastbound Detroit Corridor with 2.

At least 41 trains departed their initial terminals too late to permit an on-time arrival.

Of the trains more than 2' late, the Lake Shore Limited had 16, the Capitol Limited 13, the Crescent 10, and the Cardinal 3.

The low performance of the westbound Cardinal is puzzling given the 30" or more of padding on the ex-C&O portion of the route combined with the 1' 45" dwell time at Indianapolis. For whatever reason, both directions of this service consistently lose time between Cincinnati and Dyer. Perhaps one of the readers can provide some insight on the problems of this route.

Overall, while some gains were achieved in this period, there is still much improvement to be made on a consistent basis before Amtrak achieves an acceptable and reliable level of performance.
shlustig
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:11 am

Postby John_Perkowski on Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:03 pm

As always, thank you Mr Lustig, and thank you for the bottom line of your report:

S H Lustig wrote:Overall, while some gains were achieved in this period, there is still much improvement to be made on a consistent basis before Amtrak achieves an acceptable and reliable level of performance.
~John Perkowski: Moderator: General Discussion: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Equipment
Please don't feed the spammers! If you see spam, please notify a Moderator
User avatar
John_Perkowski
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: Off the Q main near Parkville MO

Postby gprimr1 on Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:33 pm

What exactly is the Syracuse corridor? Is that Empire Service?
~Greg Primrose :: My Train Photos
My Trip Photos
"I'm leaving on a jet train, don't know when I'll be back again. Bags are packed and there ready to go."
User avatar
gprimr1
 
Posts: 2638
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:39 pm
Location: Towson Maryland

Postby dumpster.penguin on Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:26 pm

I, too, am perennially confused about the "Syracuse Corridor" in these statistics. I hope it includes only #281, #283, #285, and their opposite numbers eastbound. I hope it excludes #63 and the LSL, #49, because their timekeeping faces inaggregable challenges. The LSL is even accounted for separately. Alas, I suspect the Syracuse Corridor includes the LSL: out of the whole bunch, only that train doesn't stop in Niagara Falls, and coincidentally, the statistician didn't call the statistic "Niagara Falls Corridor".

To shlustig's credit, this has been explained before, but it keeps slipping my mind. I hope a clarification of "Syracuse Corridor" will show up as a reminder asterisk at the bottom of future reports.
dumpster.penguin
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:57 pm

Postby shlustig on Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:46 pm

The Syracuse Corridor includes the 4 round trips between NYP and SYR. These include #'s 63, 283/281, 285, and 49 westbound; #'s 280/282/284, 48, 286/288, and 64 eastbound. Performance west of SYR is not monitored because (A) of the traditional drop in the passenger count west of SYR and (B) our old divisional territory (Mohawk-Hudson Div.) ended just west of SYR.

The performance levels will vary from that of #48 on the CHI / NYP run as passengers frequently are able to take other trains (#'s 282, 284, or even 286) and reduce the delay of a late #48 or even arrive on time for #48's schedule. If #282 is actually running late on #48's timing, then it will handle #48's traffic from SYR east.

I don't see any problem in accounting for #63's or #49's performance as this is the start of the trek to TOR or CHI.

Given the fact that part of this corridor has had higher-speed service (90 & 110 mph limits) for 20+ years, it serves as a comparison for the other corridors in the review which are the "test beds" for "higher-spped diesel operations".

Hope this helps.
shlustig
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:11 am

Postby John_Perkowski on Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:07 pm

MODERATOR'S NOTE:

Members should remember that Mr Lustig gives this data reduction every month. He's been consistent in doing it for several years.

The data reduction is his ongoing labor of love after a particular project.

Members are welcome to give the time and effort needed to set up this kind of data stream for their own area of interest. When a Member sets up an ongoing data stream, the Member gets to set the parameters.

Thank you for your attention.
~John Perkowski: Moderator: General Discussion: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Equipment
Please don't feed the spammers! If you see spam, please notify a Moderator
User avatar
John_Perkowski
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:12 pm
Location: Off the Q main near Parkville MO

Postby prr60 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:36 pm

Acela On-time for Rate for Dec-06

Boston to New York 87.0%
Average trip time (hr:min): 3:32: average trip (min:sec) 02:42 late
Trips scheduled 200; trips 15 or more minutes late 20; trips cancelled 6

New York to Boston 94.0%
Average trip time (hr:min): 3:34: average trip (min:sec) 01:05 early
Trips scheduled 199; trips 15 or more minutes late 11; trips cancelled 1

New York to Washington 91.7%
Average trip time (hr:min): 2:48: average trip (min:sec) 02:30 late
Trips scheduled 327; trips 15 or more minutes late 24; trips cancelled 3

Washington to New York 96.0%
Average trip time (hr:min): 2:45: average trip (min:sec) 00:25 late
Trips scheduled 327; trips 15 or more minutes late 11; trips cancelled 2

All trips 92.6%
Average trip (min:sec) 01:12 late
Trips scheduled 1053; trips 15 or more minutes late 66; trips cancelled 12

The fine print: The NYC/WAS and NYC/BOS city pairs are each counted separately. Through trains between Washington and Boston are counted as two trains. On-time is arrival early, on-schedule, or up to 14 minutes behind schedule (DOT Airline Reporting Criteria). Cancelled trains include all trains that either did not run or did not complete the trip. Data is from the Amtrak.com train status feature.
prr60
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:04 pm
Location: Southern NJ

Postby prr60 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:46 pm

Harrisburg - Philadelphia On-time Rate for Dec-06 (Keystones only)

Harrisburg to Philadelphia 82.1% on-time
Average trip time (hr:min): 1:47: average trip (min:sec) 04:02 late
Trips scheduled 330; trips 11 or more minutes late 57; trips cancelled 2

Philadelphia to Harrisburg 77.0% on-time
Average trip time (hr:min): 1:49: average trip (min:sec) 07:28 late
Trips scheduled 331; trips 11 or more minutes late 73; trips cancelled 3

Totals for Both Directions 79.6% on-time
Average trip time (hr:min): 1:48: average trip (min:sec) 05:45 late
Trips scheduled 661; trips 11 or more minutes late 130; trips cancelled 5

The fine print:
On-time is arrival early, on-schedule, or up to 10 minutes behind schedule (Amtrak short-distance criteria). Cancelled trains include all trains that either did not run or did not complete the trip. Data is from the Amtrak.com train status feature.
prr60
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:04 pm
Location: Southern NJ

Postby travelrobb on Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:25 am

Thanks for the stats, prr60!

I didn't see them when you first post them; when shlustig told me that he had "no interest in monitoring" the NEC, I lost interest in monitoring his threads.

I hope you'll continue to post NEC/Keystone data, and if you have it, could you be persuaded to add NEC regional service, too?

Thanks,

Robb
travelrobb
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:39 pm


Return to Amtrak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andegold, Vincent and 4 guests