1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Discussion relating to the B&O up to it's 1972 merger into Chessie System. Visit the B&O Railroad Historical Society for more information. Also discussion of the C&O up to 1972. Visit the C&O Historical Society for more information. Also includes the WM up to 1972. Visit the WM Historical Society for more information.

1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby shlustig » Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:39 am

PASSENGER X7625 WEST (18 HEAD-END CARS + 1 RIDER COACH) proceeding from Cumberland toward Grafton at about 40mph derailed the locomotive, tender, and head 7 cars on an 8@ curve. The engine overturned to the right and the cars remained upright. Engineer was killed and the fireman was injured.

Speed was within the maximum for the location, and there was no dragging equipment on the locomotive. Track was found to be faulty in gauge, alignment, and superelevation.

Query: how often were the 7600's used on passenger or M&E trains?
shlustig
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:11 am

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby hutton_switch » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:39 am

Not often. Here is my speculation based on location and how B&O operated at this particular time: It's quite probable that there was no smaller locomotive available at the time when such a timed train as this needed to get and keep moving, so the EM-1 likely was the only one available. A quick perusal of the ICC accident report I have gives no origin or ultimate destination of the M&E train in question. My guess is that the urgency of the M&E train movement was too critical to allow enough time for replenishment of the original train's tender's coal and water (likely smaller original equipment coupled at origin), so the EM-1 was coupled (most probably at Keyser, WV, the eastern base of the EM-1's on the West End) to continue the move up Seventeen Mile Grade, on to Grafton, WV, where if the train hadn't derailed, another smaller locomotive would have continued moving the M&E train on westward, likely to St. Louis or Cincinnati.
Wade Rice
Member, B&O RR Historical Society
http://www.borhs.org
Daniel Willard (1860-1942) and Jervis Langdon, Jr. (1905-2004) - Two of B&O's best presidents and managers!
President Leonor Loree (1858-1940) brought the B&O into the 20th century!
hutton_switch
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Feasterville Trevose, PA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby shlustig » Tue Jan 23, 2018 8:29 am

Thanks, Wade:

Did any or all of the 7600's have steam and communication signal lines for use on passenger trains?
shlustig
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:11 am

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby hutton_switch » Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:54 am

shlustig wrote:Did any or all of the 7600's have steam and communication signal lines for use on passenger trains?

My only book source dedicated solely to the EM-1 (Tom Dixon's softbound book that's chock full of photos, but a little limited on narrative), makes mention of those locomotives being used in the service that prompted you to ask about this in the first place, but does say that after the accident you asked about, M&E service using those locomotives was discontinued. Also, there was no mention of their being equipped with steam and communication signal lines, and I haven't seen mention elsewhere where they were so-equipped. So my thinking is no, they were not equipped with those appurtenances, being as the EM-1's were not built or intended for such use.
Wade Rice
Member, B&O RR Historical Society
http://www.borhs.org
Daniel Willard (1860-1942) and Jervis Langdon, Jr. (1905-2004) - Two of B&O's best presidents and managers!
President Leonor Loree (1858-1940) brought the B&O into the 20th century!
hutton_switch
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Feasterville Trevose, PA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby shlustig » Sat Jan 27, 2018 9:30 am

Wade, Thank you for the additional information.
shlustig
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 9:11 am

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby mmi16 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:04 pm

hutton_switch wrote:Not often. Here is my speculation based on location and how B&O operated at this particular time: It's quite probable that there was no smaller locomotive available at the time when such a timed train as this needed to get and keep moving, so the EM-1 likely was the only one available. A quick perusal of the ICC accident report I have gives no origin or ultimate destination of the M&E train in question. My guess is that the urgency of the M&E train movement was too critical to allow enough time for replenishment of the original train's tender's coal and water (likely smaller original equipment coupled at origin), so the EM-1 was coupled (most probably at Keyser, WV, the eastern base of the EM-1's on the West End) to continue the move up Seventeen Mile Grade, on to Grafton, WV, where if the train hadn't derailed, another smaller locomotive would have continued moving the M&E train on westward, likely to St. Louis or Cincinnati.

I suspect at a train size of 19 cars, if the EM-1 wasn't used for the assignment the train would have had to be double headed over the territory with two locomotives and two locomotive crews.
'
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
User avatar
mmi16
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: USA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby hutton_switch » Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:26 am

mmi16 wrote:I suspect at a train size of 19 cars, if the EM-1 wasn't used for the assignment the train would have had to be double headed over the territory with two locomotives and two locomotive crews.

Logical assumption. M&E trains on the B&O were always high priority, particularly coming out of Washington, DC, and a major source of income for the B&O. In normal situations, such trains were quite likely pulled by a single 4-6-2 Pacific up until Keyser, with two similar replacements with fresh crews and filled tenders added at Keyser to continue the fast journey westward over the mountain grades. All this, provided that the locomotives and crews were available. This situation with the EM-1 was unusual.
Wade Rice
Member, B&O RR Historical Society
http://www.borhs.org
Daniel Willard (1860-1942) and Jervis Langdon, Jr. (1905-2004) - Two of B&O's best presidents and managers!
President Leonor Loree (1858-1940) brought the B&O into the 20th century!
hutton_switch
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Feasterville Trevose, PA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby mmi16 » Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:48 pm

hutton_switch wrote:
mmi16 wrote:I suspect at a train size of 19 cars, if the EM-1 wasn't used for the assignment the train would have had to be double headed over the territory with two locomotives and two locomotive crews.

Logical assumption. M&E trains on the B&O were always high priority, particularly coming out of Washington, DC, and a major source of income for the B&O. In normal situations, such trains were quite likely pulled by a single 4-6-2 Pacific up until Keyser, with two similar replacements with fresh crews and filled tenders added at Keyser to continue the fast journey westward over the mountain grades. All this, provided that the locomotives and crews were available. This situation with the EM-1 was unusual.

With at train of that size I would expect one of the Mountain T Class engines would have handled the train from DC to Keyser to attach a helper to get to Grafton.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
User avatar
mmi16
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: USA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby hutton_switch » Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:30 am

mmi16 wrote:
hutton_switch wrote:
mmi16 wrote:I suspect at a train size of 19 cars, if the EM-1 wasn't used for the assignment the train would have had to be double headed over the territory with two locomotives and two locomotive crews.

Logical assumption. M&E trains on the B&O were always high priority, particularly coming out of Washington, DC, and a major source of income for the B&O. In normal situations, such trains were quite likely pulled by a single 4-6-2 Pacific up until Keyser, with two similar replacements with fresh crews and filled tenders added at Keyser to continue the fast journey westward over the mountain grades. All this, provided that the locomotives and crews were available. This situation with the EM-1 was unusual.

With at train of that size I would expect one of the Mountain T Class engines would have handled the train from DC to Keyser to attach a helper to get to Grafton.

Yes, provided that one had been available. That probably was not the case at the time with the urgency of keeping this M&E train on schedule to its destination.
Wade Rice
Member, B&O RR Historical Society
http://www.borhs.org
Daniel Willard (1860-1942) and Jervis Langdon, Jr. (1905-2004) - Two of B&O's best presidents and managers!
President Leonor Loree (1858-1940) brought the B&O into the 20th century!
hutton_switch
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Feasterville Trevose, PA

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby D Alex » Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:39 pm

hutton_switch wrote:
shlustig wrote:Did any or all of the 7600's have steam and communication signal lines for use on passenger trains?
... there was no mention of their being equipped with steam and communication signal lines, and I haven't seen mention elsewhere where they were so-equipped. So my thinking is no, they were not equipped with those appurtenances, being as the EM-1's were not built or intended for such use.


Quick question: Since it was January, and you think that steam lines were not available, how would they heat the cars?
D Alex
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:15 pm

Re: 1/21/47 - OAKLAND, MD

Postby hutton_switch » Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:41 pm

D Alex wrote:
hutton_switch wrote:
shlustig wrote:Did any or all of the 7600's have steam and communication signal lines for use on passenger trains?
... there was no mention of their being equipped with steam and communication signal lines, and I haven't seen mention elsewhere where they were so-equipped. So my thinking is no, they were not equipped with those appurtenances, being as the EM-1's were not built or intended for such use.


Quick question: Since it was January, and you think that steam lines were not available, how would they heat the cars?

This was an M&E (Mail & Express [freight]) train. No passengers, so no need to heat any cars. I figure that the "mail" portion was already pre-sorted mail at origin (likely Washington, DC), in bags/pouches (no RPO car), though I could be wrong.
Wade Rice
Member, B&O RR Historical Society
http://www.borhs.org
Daniel Willard (1860-1942) and Jervis Langdon, Jr. (1905-2004) - Two of B&O's best presidents and managers!
President Leonor Loree (1858-1940) brought the B&O into the 20th century!
hutton_switch
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Feasterville Trevose, PA


Return to Baltimore & Ohio/Chesapeake & Ohio/Western Maryland

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest