Green Line Type 10 thread

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby Arlington » Sat Dec 30, 2017 1:37 pm

The Type 10 is officially "a thing", with the posting of Engineering and Program Management Services in support of the Green Line Type 10
[the Manager] will assist the Authority with delivering the GLT10LRV procurement from contractor competitive procurement phase to full implementation on the entire Green Line. The firm shall be led by a senior level project manager with expertise in rail vehicle engineering and project management.

The GLT10LRV will be electrically propelled, double ended, articulated, low floor light rail vehicle designed to operate successfully on the Green Line for a minimum service life of 25 years. The GLT10LRVP will replace the existing Green Line Type 7 and 8 fleets.
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington
 
Posts: 3680
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:51 am
Location: Medford MA (was Arlington MA and Arlington VA)

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby BandA » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:44 pm

I'd like to see the Type 9's delivered before the the Type 10 specifications are frozen! We know the Type 8's are Fail.

What are the best examples of low floor LRVs in service?
User avatar
BandA
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby andrewjw » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:53 pm

BandA wrote:I'd like to see the Type 9's delivered before the the Type 10 specifications are frozen! We know the Type 8's are Fail.

What are the best examples of low floor LRVs in service?

Siemens S70, Alstom Citadis?
andrewjw
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:48 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby diburning » Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:54 am

CAF Urbos 3 (which is what the Type 9s are based on). And to some extent, the Bombardier Flexity perhaps?
User avatar
diburning
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: Practicing safe CSX by using Three-Step Protection

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby Arlington » Mon May 07, 2018 8:26 pm

The Type 10 is now being pitched as part of a 3.5b package that would nearly double GL capacity in 4 stages through 2030.

The package envisions:
- doubling the length of a standard "car" (1 or no motorman, 7 segments)
- eliminating curves of <50' radius (Park St, line-end turns, Brattle loop?)
- upgrading bridges (eg Lechmere Viaduct) to carry heavier, simultaneous trains going faster
- and more

FMCB May 7th Meeting:

Overview
Capacity
Construction
Last edited by CRail on Mon May 07, 2018 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Railborne vehicles are not driven, and the people who operate them are not drivers.
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Arlington
 
Posts: 3680
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:51 am
Location: Medford MA (was Arlington MA and Arlington VA)

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby rethcir » Tue May 08, 2018 7:02 pm

Well, I sure hope they don’t have to shut the whole GLX down to rebuild it to support the new cars or anything like that.
rethcir
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:51 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby Disney Guy » Wed May 09, 2018 11:06 am

Would longer Type 10 (or Type 11) cars really double the capacity of the Green Line compared with Type 7 and TYpe 8 cars?

One seven segment Type 10 is proposed to be about 110 feet long, about 1-1/2 the length of one of today's cars.

Two Type 7/8 cars at 140 feet carry several more people than one proposed Type 10. Three Type 7/8s occupy the same space and would be expected to carry the same passengers as two Type 10s. To the extent that three Type 7/8s might be (are?) considered undesirable in the street going to Heath St., two Type 10's would be similarly undesirable.

Operationally we will be able to try playing the "double the capacity" game when the Type 9's arrive, providing quantity of cars as opposed to "quality." Or maybe sooner. The throughput bottleneck at subway stops will not go away with new cars; a new protocol is needed. Single Type 10's with a few deuces post 2020 will slog through the stations just as slowly as today's all-deuce Type 7/8 trains using today's rules and protocol with one train at a time in a station. Type 10s will slog through the streets just as slowly as Type 7/8s given today's traffic light technology.

Would the T consider a trial period (perhaps a 3 month rating period) using a large number of 3 car Type 7/8 trains to demonstrate the increase of capacity that Type 10s with some deuces should achieve?
(To the theater stage manager) Quit twiddling the knob and flickering the lights while the audience is entering and being seated. (To the subway motorman) Quit twiddling the knob and dinging the doors while passengers are getting off and others are waiting to board.
User avatar
Disney Guy
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Nashua, NH

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby jwhite07 » Wed May 09, 2018 11:44 am

If the T had enough cars available, they should be running 3 car trains NOW to alleviate horrendous overcrowding, not just as a trial. But they don't, and won't until all of the Type 7s are back from rehab and possibly enough Type 9s are accepted and operating. in short, not this year.
User avatar
jwhite07
 
Posts: 1444
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:39 pm

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby BandA » Wed May 09, 2018 3:21 pm

They need cars that allow movement from one end to the other, so that when they are in a station without fare gates the single operator can just open the front door. That really means coupling an arbitrary number of segments rather than separate cars.
User avatar
BandA
 
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby orange1234 » Wed May 09, 2018 5:43 pm

Disney Guy wrote:Would longer Type 10 (or Type 11) cars really double the capacity of the Green Line compared with Type 7 and TYpe 8 cars?

One seven segment Type 10 is proposed to be about 110 feet long, about 1-1/2 the length of one of today's cars.

Two Type 7/8 cars at 140 feet carry several more people than one proposed Type 10. Three Type 7/8s occupy the same space and would be expected to carry the same passengers as two Type 10s. To the extent that three Type 7/8s might be (are?) considered undesirable in the street going to Heath St., two Type 10's would be similarly undesirable.


Yes. Two Type 7/8 cars have four cabs. A single "Concept D" vehicle has two cabs. There would also be a single, continuous floor with no stairs along the length of a "Concept D" vehicle.

Disney Guy wrote:Would the T consider a trial period (perhaps a 3 month rating period) using a large number of 3 car Type 7/8 trains to demonstrate the increase of capacity that Type 10s with some deuces should achieve?


There would be enough cars for this by next year, but the power delivery infrastructure would need significant upgrades to accommodate more than a few 3-car trains during rush hour.
orange1234
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 4:01 pm

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby houseman86 » Thu May 10, 2018 8:28 am

I'm assuming the T is going to do the lechmere viaduct project at the same time that the new lechmere station is being built.

It would actually make a lot of sense. So that services on the new line don't have to be effected
houseman86
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:16 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby ceo » Thu May 10, 2018 1:35 pm

BandA wrote:They need cars that allow movement from one end to the other, so that when they are in a station without fare gates the single operator can just open the front door. That really means coupling an arbitrary number of segments rather than separate cars.

The T is moving to all-doors boarding on the Green Line and buses with the AFC 2.0 program, so this won't be an issue.
ceo
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:28 am

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby Type7trolley » Sat May 12, 2018 4:31 pm

One issue with these cars I could foresee is the speeds on the Highland branch. I don't know of any system running these multi-articulation all low floor streetcars at high speeds ie. above 35mph. They seem to be suited for slow, traditional street running operation rather than the near interurban level service the D line sees. I would imagine without trucks the ride would be quite rough at those speeds. They mention keeping the Type 9s in service, so maybe they will try to concentrate them on that line, though I'm not sure the total number of Type 9s is enough to completely cover it.
User avatar
Type7trolley
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby The EGE » Sat May 12, 2018 4:45 pm

Siemens S70, Bombardier Flexity, and Alstom Citadis (the three dominant multi-articulated brands) all have both 35mph 'streetcar' and 55-65mph 'light rail' versions. The MBTA would certainly obtain the 55mph version for use on the Riverside Line (currently 40mph, but fully capable of 50mph once the Type 8s are gone) and GLX (designed for 50mph ops). You would actually see travel times drop on those sections of the system.
User avatar
The EGE
 
Posts: 2521
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:16 pm
Location: Waiting for the N Judah

Re: Green Line Type 10 thread

Postby CRail » Sat May 12, 2018 5:00 pm

Or return to what they were since the Highland Branch was 50mph with no speed restrictions on crossovers before 8s ran on it.
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).
User avatar
CRail
 
Posts: 2286
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Next

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 10 guests