Why B Units?

Discussion relating to the BN, and its predecessors GN, NP, CB&Q, SP&S, SL-SF, and their subsidiaries. Visit the Friends of the Burlington Northern for more information.

Why B Units?

Postby ThePointyHairedBoss » Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:17 am

I have a question: Why did BN leave some SD40-2's as B Units? It makes no sense to me. Why didn't they rebuild them with cabs after their accidents, a B units is less useful than an A unit in many ways. For a start they can never lead trains, and wouldn't it be more economically viable to rebuild the units back in the long run after wrecks? Just a question.

Postby Engineer Spike » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:31 pm

I think that they did the cabless units because it was cheaper. All they needed was some sheet metal, in order to make a new hood. Look at SW1000 442. They just put a diamond plate floor where the cab floor was. I think that they just put railings around it.
If they built it back, they would have had to fabricate a new one. The other option would have been to buy a new one from EMD. That cab then needs all fixtures installed.
I don't know if it is true, but I heard that the leasing company was mad about the SD40-2. This unit went to SOO. The owner supposedly said that the unit should have been returned in its original configuration, minus wear and tear.
There was another SD40-2, although not converted to a B unit, had a SD45 hood. I was told that this was due to a wreck too.
When I was a hostler at Clyde Roundhouse, It was a pain to make up some consists. At that time we still had the B30-7 cabless units. Some of the foreign units were a problem too. The foreign units sometimes did not have cab appliances required by CB&Q labor contracts. The result was extra switching moves. Sometimes the only good leader had to be turned.
Engineer Spike
Posts: 1750
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 3:24 pm

Return to Burlington Northern, GN, NP, CB&Q, SP&S, SL-SF

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest