M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

Locked
DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by DutchRailnut » Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:28 pm

at about 2.12 mark.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

geico
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by geico » Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:05 pm

Why do I see this biting MNRR in the butt in a few years....

Ridgefielder
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: Harlem Division MP 15

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by Ridgefielder » Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:28 am

geico wrote:Why do I see this biting MNRR in the butt in a few years....
My understanding is that, for capacity reasons, MNRR wants to go to bi-levels. My understanding is also that, because of the clearances in the Park Ave Tunnel, bi-level MU's aren't going to work. There wouldn't be enough room underfloor or on the roof for the mechanicals. Next-gen MNRR equipment is likely to be loco-hauled coaches. Meaning MNRR is going to be in the market for electric motors at some point.

Backshophoss
Posts: 5999
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by Backshophoss » Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:46 pm

Most likely MN is thinking of the NJT MLV-II design as the next loco hauled Coach/Cab Car,to be shared with LIRR as their C-5 coach/cab car
and with ConnDOT as the next gen Shoreliner design.
Since MN opted out of the M-9,Figure on the MN/ConnDOT M-10 design and the M-11 design next up after the loco hauled coach replacement
is online.

Traingeek3629
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:00 am

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by Traingeek3629 » Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:37 pm

I suspect in 5 or so years MN will either cave in and order the M-9s or get some sort of new equipment.
TRAIN APPROACHING, PLEASE REMAIN BEHIND THE YELLOW LINE

Zuccaraillo
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:50 pm

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by Zuccaraillo » Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:19 am

Backshophoss wrote:Most likely MN is thinking of the NJT MLV-II design as the next loco hauled Coach/Cab Car,to be shared with LIRR as their C-5 coach/cab car
and with ConnDOT as the next gen Shoreliner design.
Since MN opted out of the M-9,Figure on the MN/ConnDOT M-10 design and the M-11 design next up after the loco hauled coach replacement
is online.
Very likely; their success with NJT has led to MARC and AMT(exi) to buying them. I am unsure if the existing P32 and DE30/DM30 locos will be able to handle the HEP load required by the Bombardier MLs.
Known as “CentralJerseyRailfan” on YouTube and Instagram.

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by DutchRailnut » Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:25 am

The DE/DM handles bi-levels now 6 per engine.
The Genesis has a 1 mw HEP inverter which is currently max capacity of the HEP systems in USA and good for about 12 cars including superliners.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

ConstanceR46
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:57 pm

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by ConstanceR46 » Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:08 pm

I think that a new car purchase for the LIRR would come along with or after new engines, as the coaches last longer than the engines.

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by DutchRailnut » Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:26 am

ok mn , not lirr. were getting of beaten path.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Locked

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”