Inspection Train Status

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith

Re: Inspection train

Postby Steamboat Willie » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:10 pm

It was the holiday train. Made stops at Stamford, Bridgeport and New Haven yards then returned to Harmon.
User avatar
Steamboat Willie
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Iron Highway

Re: Inspection train

Postby SouthernRailway » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:48 pm

There was a 3-car train parked at GCT today around track 28 or so, consisting of 3 streamlined cars and a standard MNR diesel (a P32?). I couldn't tell if the platform was blocked off, but there was a pretty good-sized crowd there, with a lot of people wearing name tags, and checkout lane-type dividers set up on the platform.

Was this some type of Metro-North holiday event?
SouthernRailway
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 8:27 pm

Re: Inspection train

Postby DutchRailnut » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:49 pm

Yes its a moving holiday reception for Employees.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 20960
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: Inspection train

Postby Clean Cab » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:41 pm

Gee, I won't be there to get my Xmas gift!! :(
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!
Clean Cab
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: Inspection train

Postby DutchRailnut » Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:19 am

its for Employees only John, so they did not include a gift for you.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 20960
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: MN inspection train

Postby FL9AC » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:52 am

Inspection train just left eastbound out of Stamford Platform with the 213 leading the 229 and the three inspection cars.
User avatar
FL9AC
 
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: Brewster, N.Y

Re: MN inspection train

Postby Clean Cab » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:48 pm

Inspection Trains are a waste of money. Railroad officials should ride regularly scheduled trains to see how the crews are interacting with the passengers and how well the trains are running. Providing a private train is very expensive and if any railroad wants to look fiscally responsible, they should not indulge in such a luxury.
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!
Clean Cab
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: MN inspection train

Postby DutchRailnut » Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:27 am

wow how opinions change when no longer on payroll ;-)
The inspection train is under utilized but improving, the benefits of inspection trains far outweigh the cost.
A new inspection train when finaly build can be inspection train, training train, geometry train, private train.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 20960
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: MN inspection train

Postby Clean Cab » Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:55 am

This is not a change of opinion. I've always thought inspection trains were an expensive way for the big shots to get out into the field. MN operates over 500 trains a day, and the taxpayers have to spring for thousands of extra dollars so they can have their own private ride? No wonder the MTA is always broke!!!
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!
Clean Cab
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: MN inspection train

Postby bigK » Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:48 am

RE:Clean Cab

Railroad officials should ride regularly scheduled trains to see how the crews are interacting with the passengers and how well the trains are running.


they do ... see the post and Newsday article excerpt about Howard Permut - MNRR pres.

http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=121476

in the Newsday article there is a pic of him at a station among the AM commuters on a sceduled revenue train - however he rode in the cab (a soutbound train)
User avatar
bigK
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:03 pm

Re: MN inspection train

Postby Clean Cab » Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:16 am

bigK wrote:RE:Clean Cab

Railroad officials should ride regularly scheduled trains to see how the crews are interacting with the passengers and how well the trains are running.


they do ... see the post and Newsday article excerpt about Howard Permut - MNRR pres.

http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=121476

in the Newsday article there is a pic of him at a station among the AM commuters on a sceduled revenue train - however he rode in the cab (a soutbound train)


I was aware of this and that's why I so strongly advocate that inspection trains are unessecary and needlessly costly.
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!
Clean Cab
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: MN inspection train

Postby DutchRailnut » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:22 pm

The inspection train is a lot more than just a ride, they bring legislators and show them were improvements are needed.
They check out construction at locations a revenue train is not gone stop to let staff and politicians smooze. etc etc
Its simply not about the ride but what happens during that ride, no way staff could conduct business with passengers around.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 20960
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: MN inspection train

Postby BobLI » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:59 pm

Dutch,
just how costly can the inspection train be? Dont they take an engineer and conductor from a pool and assign them to the train for that day?
Whats the big deal that some of the posters are moaning about if they do that?
If you want the MTA to save money then get rid of all the deputy this and assistant that, etc.
BobLI
 
Posts: 971
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 7:46 am
Location: NY

Re: MN inspection train

Postby DutchRailnut » Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:01 pm

Correct the crew is 80% of time from Extra list and they get paid no matter what they do.
the other 20% of time its a crew on overtime, the benefits of inspection trains are there, even if we can not always see the reasons as outsiders.
right Clean cab ??
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 20960
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: MN inspection train

Postby Clean Cab » Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:13 pm

That's Mr. Clean Cab!!! :) Of course having trains to run is good for the train crews and I will admit that at times inspection trains can do some good and bring good PR. But too many times I saw the train doing another "what the heck" type of trip with low level officials on board riding a route that they've ridden many times before.
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!
Clean Cab
 
Posts: 2894
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

PreviousNext

Return to MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests