Piermont Branch (Orig Erie Main) aka Suffern Industrial

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

Spring Valley to Suffern Connection

Postby railtrailbiker » Tue May 11, 2004 2:05 pm

Does anyone know when the last train (freight or passenger) ran between Spring Valley and Suffern?

Also, where exactly is the washout that's preventing any traffic from using that line now?

Thanks.
Last edited by railtrailbiker on Fri May 14, 2004 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
railtrailbiker
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: Bergen County, NJ

Postby Butlershops » Tue May 11, 2004 2:23 pm

You might get more information on this matter in the NY State Railfans or Metro-North forums. I think Metro-North owns this line.
Butlershops
 

Postby 7 Train » Thu May 13, 2004 6:36 pm

No, NJT owns the entire section from Hoboken-Spring Valley. NS owns the Suffern Industrial Track.
7 Train
 

Postby Irish Chieftain » Thu May 13, 2004 7:21 pm

False. NJT owns from Hoboken to Montvale, at the NJ border.
Irish Chieftain
 

Postby 7 Train » Thu May 13, 2004 8:16 pm

I saw a rail track map showing that the section in NY State is owned NJT? Is it still? Or is it MNR?
7 Train
 

Postby mb » Thu May 13, 2004 8:54 pm

I almost 100% sure it's all owned by NJT. MNRR maintains the stations.
mb
 

Piermont Branch

Postby wantsrail » Thu May 13, 2004 10:58 pm

The washout on the Piermont Branch is located in Monsey about half a mile west of Christmas Tree Rd. It is not much of a washout. It would have taken only a couple days to replace.

MNRR owns the Piermont branch from Spring Valley to Suffren. I have walked this segment.

NJ Transit does not own any tracks in NY State.
Albert F. Cafiero
wantsrail
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:53 pm

Postby 7 Train » Fri May 14, 2004 6:41 pm

I thought Spring Valley-Suffern (Suffern Industrial Track) was NS.
7 Train
 

Piermont Branch (Orig Erie Main) aka Suffern Industrial

Postby JoeG » Thu Sep 30, 2004 8:14 am

I've noticed trackwork on the Piermont Branch in Suffern. Now, new ballast has been added.
Does anyone know if there are any new plans for this line?
JoeG
 

Postby railtrailbiker » Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:17 am

Well of course you're aware that several towns in the Pascack Valley believed NS was preparing to run "heavy frieght" via the PVL.

In order to do that, repairs and upgrades would have been necessary to the Piermont Branch between Suffern and Spring Valley.

So maybe that's what you're seeing. However, I believe there is still a major wash out in Monsey - a non passable one. That would need to be fixed prior to any through service being instituted.
railtrailbiker
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: Bergen County, NJ

Postby JoeG » Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:32 pm

Even with what trackwork they have done, the branch isn't exactly a high-speed, heavy-duty railroad. I had hoped maybe it was going to be used for equipment moves between Spring Valley and Suffern. From what I understand, the washout in Monsey wouldn't be a major obstacle.
The myth about major freight on the PVL is so bizarre! The railroad dead-ends in Spring Valley. At most, it would go to Suffern. Where do those NIMBYs think the major freight might come from, or go to?
JoeG
 

Postby Lackawanna484 » Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:43 pm

Back in the mid-1990s, I asked a planning officer in Rockland County about the Monsey Line, and the possibility of through service Suffern to Spring Valley to Hoboken.

He just laughed. Said it would be a great idea, and everyone agreed it would be a great idea. But the communities in the way were deeply entrenched, politically very powerful, and would not be receptive. Even though many people take the Red & Tan and Short Line buses to PABT.

Fifteen years without train service is a long time. Bringing back a dangerous, loud, smoky train would defile the neighborhoods. It would be the Pascack Valley debacle raised to the tenth power.
Lackawanna484
 

Postby railtrailbiker » Thu Sep 30, 2004 4:45 pm

Pascack Valley area residents, led by NJ State Assemblywoman Elizabeth Randall, believe freight traffic would be originating west of PJ and that NS would want a route to compete with the CSX River Line.

Since the PVL isn't used at night by NJT, and the Bergen/Main Line is, "heavy freight" could be routed from points west to the Jersey City area overnight.

Equipment moves via the Piermont Branch is the most likely reason for the recent track work. Even a limited number of overnight moves will bring the NIMBYs out in force though.
railtrailbiker
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: Bergen County, NJ

Postby trainfreak » Thu Sep 30, 2004 4:48 pm

Is this the line that you can see from Rt 287 when you go east just getting out of Suffern? I know there is one grade crossing that can easily be seen from the highway and i was wondering if this was the line.
Jeff
View my photos here.
View my videos here.
trainfreak
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Somewhere Between Wantage, NJ. and Williamsport, Pa.

Postby Lackawanna484 » Thu Sep 30, 2004 6:10 pm

trainfreak wrote:Is this the line that you can see from Rt 287 when you go east just getting out of Suffern? I know there is one grade crossing that can easily be seen from the highway and i was wondering if this was the line.


------------

Yes.

It was originally the main line of the Erie, running to Pier-mont dock.
Lackawanna484
 

Next

Return to MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests