CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby Jeff Smith » Sat Feb 16, 2019 5:45 pm

https://www.westport-news.com/news/arti ... 616841.php

...
Senate Bill No. 163, “An Act Concerning Wireless Internet Availability on the New Haven Line of the Metro-North Commuter Railroad,” would require Metro-North to provide high-quality, complimentary wireless Internet access to riders of the New Haven train line.

“When Boston’s commuter rail service supports Wi-Fi service, Connecticut is placed at a competitive disadvantage. Employers tell us that improving our outdated infrastructure is crucial to revitalizing our economy. Realtors tell us that potential buyers look closely at the commuting experience before investing in our community. We cannot afford to allow Metro-North to remain stuck in the past,†said Sen. Haskell. “Connecticut commuters deserve better than to be forced to rely on frankly unreliable phone service.”

Senate Bill No. 448, “An Act Authorizing Bonds of the State for the Construction of a Canopy Covering The Platform at the Talmadge Hill Train Station in New Canaan,” would authorize state bonds to provide a grant-in-aid to construct a canopy to provide protection against the elements at the Talmadge Hill Train Station in New Canaan.

“We cannot in good faith encourage public transportation while asking commuters to wait in the rain for their train,” said Haskell. “I hear constantly from both Democrats and Republicans in New Canaan that the experience of commuting to Manhattan must improve in order to bolster New Canaan’s real estate market. Most other Metro-North train stations offer canopies that prevent riders from getting soaked. I’m working hard to have one built for my constituents in New Canaan.”
...
Next stop, Willoughby
~Jeff Smith (fka "Sarge") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator
Jeff Smith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8098
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: MP 67.2 Georgia Southern Railway

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby DutchRailnut » Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:29 pm

never happen , since cars are operated in pairs it would take over 220 full size installations and a network that won't exist.
just so commuters can go with cheapest poor functioning cell provider ? will CT pay for all this ?

as for talmadge hill canopy , each train I operated there had people get there after train arrived and dashing across to get to choo choo , so is a canopy really cost effective ?
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22055
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby excitebike » Sun Feb 17, 2019 9:37 am

Interestingly, I've noticed that recently many M8s and M7s are broadcasting SSIDs for wifi; they are named with e.g. "M8" plus the car number. If this big installation isn't for consumer use, what else could they be for?
excitebike
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby RearOfSignal » Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:07 am

The Wi-Fi on the trains is so that the video from the interior cameras can be downloaded wirelessly for immediate review. It is not for public use.
Hurry up and wait at the signal!
User avatar
RearOfSignal
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:31 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby njt/mnrrbuff » Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:29 am

Talmadge Hill should have some sort of canopy. Maybe it doesn't have to cover the whole platform. While the New Canaan Branch might see good ridership, the question is does it warrant enough in terms of having the canopy cover the entire platform?
njt/mnrrbuff
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby GirlOnTheTrain » Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:31 pm

Build canopy or buy umbrellas...hmmmmmm
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail
User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby ExCon90 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:26 pm

DutchRailnut wrote:as for talmadge hill canopy , each train I operated there had people get there after train arrived and dashing across to get to choo choo , so is a canopy really cost effective ?

If it's raining, are they sitting in their cars until they see the train? (Or would they do that on cold days anyway?)
ExCon90
 
Posts: 4037
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:22 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby DutchRailnut » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:52 pm

they run no matter what , rain snow sun , no one wants to wait on platform.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22055
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby Backshophoss » Sun Feb 17, 2019 5:48 pm

Did ConnDOT tear down the "Bus shelter" on the Platform?
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby DutchRailnut » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:36 pm

nope
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22055
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby R36 Combine Coach » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:56 pm

The Talmadge Hill station was built 1972 just before the M-2s were accepted for service. Anyone know what older station was there before?
Since my friend continues to chain smoke nonstop, she is probably an Alco.
User avatar
R36 Combine Coach
 
Posts: 5269
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:51 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby Roadgeek Adam » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:29 pm

Talmadge Hill had a wooden tower station with a wooden platform.
...they are solid plastic, so don't settle for imitation.
User avatar
Roadgeek Adam
 
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:01 am
Location: Somewhere in Western New York

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby DutchRailnut » Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:08 am

If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22055
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby TomNelligan » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:14 am

R36 Combine Coach wrote:The Talmadge Hill station was built 1972 just before the M-2s were accepted for service. Anyone know what older station was there before?


Here is one of my photos of the 1960's station.

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/664169/
TomNelligan
 
Posts: 3291
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:43 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Postby Backshophoss » Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:29 pm

Paywalled,unless you allow adware! :( :( :(
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Next

Return to MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests