Why wasn't there an M5?

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby BuddR32 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:20 am

DutchRailnut wrote:no one was interested in the DMU version .

it will remain to be seen if just like M-5 the M-9 designations is dropped as Metro North has opted to not buy M-9's


What I dont like about this is that the LIRR ESA cars will be termed M-9A, which historically was the MNR designation of the Metropolitans (odd # series) Especially since they wont be service compatible with the M-9, they should truly be M-11.

Whatever fleet MNR uses to replace the M-3A will be the next odd number at the time, probably M-11
BuddR32
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:14 pm

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby Traingeek3629 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:04 am

And when do you think that will enter service? Not for 10-15 years at least. At which point the M3s will be nearly 50 years old.
TRAIN APPROACHING, PLEASE REMAIN BEHIND THE YELLOW LINE
Traingeek3629
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:00 am

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby Head-end View » Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:38 pm

What is LIRR's reason for calling theirs M-9A instead of just M9, or are you talking about a specific group of M-9 cars that will be dedicated only to ESA Service?
Head-end View
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: The second row on a SEPTA Silverliner V

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby DutchRailnut » Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:59 pm

maybe that question should be answered in LIRR M-9 tread.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 21822
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby BuddR32 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:55 pm

Head-end View wrote:What is LIRR's reason for calling theirs M-9A instead of just M9, or are you talking about a specific group of M-9 cars that will be dedicated only to ESA Service?


Originally wanted to be the same M9, but purchased with ESA money (federal funded.) The Federal funded cars can't have the build in NY provision, so its a separate procurement altogether, with slim hopes they'll be the same as an M9, hence 'A'
BuddR32
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:14 pm

Re: Why wasn't there an M5?

Postby Head-end View » Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:07 pm

So BuddR32, you're saying a separate contract and possibly a different manufacturer? And how many of each type are we talking about? This could get very interesting.......... And yes, maybe we'd best talk about this in the LIRR topic as Dutch suggested. LOL
Head-end View
 
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: The second row on a SEPTA Silverliner V

Previous

Return to MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests