Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby dbperry » Tue May 16, 2017 9:28 am

Auburndale news is public.

https://commonwealthmagazine.org/transp ... on-design/

TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY STEPHANIE POLLACK said on Monday that the MBTA is scrapping its design for a new Auburndale commuter rail station in response to concerns that the proposal might negatively affect the overall operation of the entire Framingham/Worcester Line.

The transportation advocacy group TransitMatters initially raised concerns about the proposed design in February, saying the MBTA’s approach could cause service disruptions for all users of the line. TransitMatters accused the T of rebuilding the station “in the worst possible way.”


Our advocacy continues. At the meeting referenced in the article where Secretary Pollack met with state lawmakers, Secretary Pollack was given a copy of a PowerPoint we drafted to package our story. The MBTA will be considering our concepts.

http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/articles/Au ... 017-05.pdf

Dave
Known to Keolis and the MBTA as "Twitter Dave"
Frequently posting about the MBTA Framingham-Worcester line on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
Owner of Framingham-Worcester Blog: http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
Maintainer of MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
User avatar
dbperry
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Suburbs of Boston

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby johnpbarlow » Sat May 20, 2017 10:46 am

The recent tour of the CWR train left behind some lengths of 136 pound rail at the Wellesley Hills station. Guessing it will be used to replace elderly 1952 era 127 pound rail? What does the MBTA do with the removed rail - does it get sold for scrap?

Track 2 looks pretty good with recent tie and ballast work.
Attachments
MBTA Wellesley Hills Station CWR 2.JPG
MBTA Wellesley Hills Station CWR 1.JPG
johnpbarlow
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:50 pm

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby F-line to Dudley via Park » Sat May 20, 2017 3:05 pm

Recycle for scrap if it's worn out. Re-use the rail somewhere else if its condition fits the bill for a less mission-critical application (easier to do with stick rail).

This isn't old pre-WWII 85 lb. stick scraped off some abandoned line. 127 lb. CWR from an active mainline is worth a lot in recycling, and there are top-tier recycling vendors who specialize in rail hardware. Progress Rail, the Caterpillar-owned company best known as a railcar manufacturer and locomotive rebuilder, has a large scrap recycling division. That's actually where they got their first start before branching out into rolling stock and logistics.
F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Posts: 7108
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: North Cambridge

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby dbperry » Mon May 22, 2017 8:57 am

johnpbarlow wrote:The recent tour of the CWR train left behind some lengths of 136 pound rail at the Wellesley Hills station. Guessing it will be used to replace elderly 1952 era 127 pound rail? What does the MBTA do with the removed rail - does it get sold for scrap?


The rail removed from the rail replacement projects between Framingham & Worcester over the past few years was relocated down along the Framingham Secondary to be installed there.

The new rail dropped near Back Bay and Wellesley will not be installed any time soon. It was / is more cost effective to buy a full train of CWR rather than a partial train. Hence some places got rail where it isn't needed immediately. There are no plans to install that new rail on the Framingham-Worcester this year. Just FYI.
Known to Keolis and the MBTA as "Twitter Dave"
Frequently posting about the MBTA Framingham-Worcester line on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
Owner of Framingham-Worcester Blog: http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
Maintainer of MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
User avatar
dbperry
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Suburbs of Boston

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby dbperry » Mon May 22, 2017 8:59 am

Sorry, I'm going to cross-post this three times since it relates to three different threads, and I want folks to be able to find it if searching for particular information.

New blog post: All about Boston Landing grand opening, including track charts, pictures, and some trivia.

http://framwormbta.weebly.com/blog/bost ... ening-more

Regards

Dave
Known to Keolis and the MBTA as "Twitter Dave"
Frequently posting about the MBTA Framingham-Worcester line on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
Owner of Framingham-Worcester Blog: http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
Maintainer of MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
User avatar
dbperry
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Suburbs of Boston

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby johnpbarlow » Mon May 22, 2017 5:07 pm

dbperry wrote:The new rail dropped near Back Bay and Wellesley will not be installed any time soon. It was / is more cost effective to buy a full train of CWR rather than a partial train. Hence some places got rail where it isn't needed immediately. There are no plans to install that new rail on the Framingham-Worcester this year. Just FYI.


Interesting... I was wondering why the MBTA would be replacing rail that it just finished de-stressing.
johnpbarlow
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:50 pm

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby octr202 » Tue May 23, 2017 6:58 am

Not surprising. Some of the rail just installed over the last 12-18 months on the Haverhill project was delivered and dropped in either 2009 or 2010!
Wondering if I'll see the Haverhill double-tracking finished before I retire...
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010
User avatar
octr202
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:13 am
Location: In the land of the once and future 73 trackless trolley.

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby harshaw » Wed May 24, 2017 7:43 am

That's kinda embarassing.

On a different note: Why is there a speed restriction (of some sort) starting before where the track goes under the pike to boston landing. (on inbound). But you also get random slowdowns in this spot on the outbound.
harshaw
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby nomis » Wed May 24, 2017 7:51 am

That's a work zone for the new CP 6 area.
Moderator: Metro-North (with CDOT), Photography & Video

Avatar: An overnight trip on Girard Ave. stumbles upon 6 PCC's and an LRV stuck within two blocks.
User avatar
nomis
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:52 pm
Location: MRS 43 (was QA 9 & QB 2)

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby dbperry » Fri May 26, 2017 3:12 pm

"Turn Table" updated - the Worcester / Framingham end of the equipment cycle for the new schedule:

http://framwormbta.weebly.com/turn-table.html
Known to Keolis and the MBTA as "Twitter Dave"
Frequently posting about the MBTA Framingham-Worcester line on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
Owner of Framingham-Worcester Blog: http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
Maintainer of MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
User avatar
dbperry
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Suburbs of Boston

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby dbperry » Fri May 26, 2017 3:18 pm

As commuter rail service improves, Worcester/Framingham line lags

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/0 ... story.html

To the dismay of its loyal riders, the Worcester/Framingham line has become something of a problem child for the MBTA’s commuter rail.

Nearly one in five trains on the heavily trafficked line was late during the second week of May. That stood in stark contrast to the rest of the network run by Keolis Commuter Services, which reported that 94 percent of all its trains ran on time, the highest mark in more than two years.


David Perry, a longtime rider from Ashland who writes a blog about the line, said he is “cautiously optimistic” about better service.

“I know that I sound like the eternal optimist, but I think we’re nearing the end of this big construction process that’s really gone on for a couple of years,” he said. “I think we should withhold judgment on on-time performance until this project is done.”


Setting myself up to get crucified when OTP doesn't improve...

(I spent a fair amount of time with her on the phone making sure she had her technical details correct (and fixing the misleading things PR flacks had told her))

There are also some good comments in the comments section...along with the Keolis / MBTA bashing.
Known to Keolis and the MBTA as "Twitter Dave"
Frequently posting about the MBTA Framingham-Worcester line on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FramWorMBTA
Owner of Framingham-Worcester Blog: http://FramWorMBTA.weebly.com/
Maintainer of MBTA schedule archive: http://www.dbperry.net/MBTA/
User avatar
dbperry
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:28 pm
Location: Suburbs of Boston

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby harshaw » Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:16 am

It is mystifying as a passenger why the train sets on this line are so random.

Are we getting a 5 car set today?
A six car set?
What's the setup? Singles mixed with doubles? The dreaded 5 car flat set (horror)?
Where do we stand on the frigging platform?

Also, can you imagine a train operator in Japan mixing up cars in a random jumble of flats mixed with singles? No. The person who did that would get fired. It's looks lazy and disorganized.

<grump grump grump>
harshaw
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby rethcir » Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:37 pm

harshaw wrote:It is mystifying as a passenger why the train sets on this line are so random.

Are we getting a 5 car set today?
A six car set?
What's the setup? Singles mixed with doubles? The dreaded 5 car flat set (horror)?
Where do we stand on the frigging platform?

Also, can you imagine a train operator in Japan mixing up cars in a random jumble of flats mixed with singles? No. The person who did that would get fired. It's looks lazy and disorganized.

<grump grump grump>


I don't think the average rider really cares if they get a seat or a prompt ride.
rethcir
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:51 am

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby RenegadeMonster » Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:04 pm

rethcir wrote:
harshaw wrote:It is mystifying as a passenger why the train sets on this line are so random.

Are we getting a 5 car set today?
A six car set?
What's the setup? Singles mixed with doubles? The dreaded 5 car flat set (horror)?
Where do we stand on the frigging platform?

Also, can you imagine a train operator in Japan mixing up cars in a random jumble of flats mixed with singles? No. The person who did that would get fired. It's looks lazy and disorganized.

<grump grump grump>


I don't think the average rider really cares if they get a seat or a prompt ride.



I think they do. I hear a whole lot of grumbling when only middle seats are available. And those people grumbling about the train being overcrowded rather stand than squeeze in.
RenegadeMonster
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Framingham/Worcester Line Questions

Postby leviramsey » Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:01 pm

RenegadeMonster wrote:
rethcir wrote:
I don't think the average rider really cares if they get a seat or a prompt ride.



I think they do. I hear a whole lot of grumbling when only middle seats are available. And those people grumbling about the train being overcrowded rather stand than squeeze in.


I think rethcir is trying to say that as long as the train is on time and they get a seat, people won't care about how the consist is made up.
leviramsey
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests