Political Heat on the Greenbush Line

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: Political Heat on the Greenbush Line

Postby nomis » Tue May 13, 2014 7:27 pm

It's interesting to note that a majority of the ridership on the line does not start with a vehicle parking at the station lot. Before looking at 'Spots Taken,' one could of made an argument that the existing station lots were filled.

Data Sources:
Inbound Boarding Data - April 2013 - 2014 Bluebook p70
Parking - Fall 2013 - 2014 Bluebook p100
Parking Lot usage, from MBTA website, computed against Parking numbers above
Attachments
greenbush_graph_1.jpg
Moderator: Metro-North (with CDOT), Photography & Video

Avatar: An overnight trip on Girard Ave. stumbles upon 6 PCC's and an LRV stuck within two blocks.
User avatar
nomis
 
Posts: 2022
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:52 pm
Location: MRS 43 (was QA 9 & QB 2)

Re: Political Heat on the Greenbush Line

Postby jscola30 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:14 pm

I actually think the figures on the other Old Colony branches are worse in terms of % of decline in ridership. I think with the Greenbush line, it's a bunch of things. Remember it opened in 2007, right as the economy was heading south. And I believe that was also during the first of those well publicized delays."the "silent strike", the Worcester train that took 4 hours to get home, etc). One other thing that's been probably discussed is the train frequency on the Greenbush line is terrible. But I don't know if that can be fixed or not. Can it recover? Maybe. I'd like to think at least the line is preserved for the future. If after it was abandoned we decided to encroach on the right of way, then in 20 years we needed...whooops....

I think too, even someone like me who likes trains and supports, sometimes taking the car SEEMS cheaper, easier, and faster. Notice I said SEEMS. Because you don't have to fill up every single day (though you may have to pay for parking), but you might have to pay for a ticket every day AND subway transfer. And when the fares and passes went up. Although I dunno, even though they ARE expensive, the passes do include subway, bus, and some include ferry service. I know at least for the NYC metro area, MN, LIRR, and NJT don't do that (I could be wrong though). So it still can be a good deal. (Primarily though if you work away from the two terminal stations). If the math does actually work out in the commuter rail's favor, maybe they should do some "do the math" ads where they show REAL numbers.

For me, there's an illusion that you control your destiny when you're in a car. You're on a train and it gets delayed, nothing you can do. There's a delay on the highway? I'll take the back roads (even though it will probably take the same amount of time). Again, the keyword is SEEMS. And yes there are times when driving is faster, in some cases A LOT faster than taking the train, not really anyone's fault, just the way it is. Keolis had those "case studies" in their proposal. If they follow through with thinking about creative ways to attract ridership, maybe that will help.
jscola30
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:18 am

Previous

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests