Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby NRGeep » Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:50 pm

newpylong wrote:
CPF363 wrote:Has the MBTA ever considered rebuilding the former New Haven between Framingham and West Concord for shuttle moves between the north and south sides? While it is true that much would have to be done to make it happen, such as rebuilding three miles of track in Sudbury, a new bridge over the Assebet River and installing the diamond in West Concord, the rest of the old line is still in place physically. Using this line would be much shorter run between the two ends verses going to Worcester and Ayer and would be entirely under the T's control. Hopefully, the T will keep this line in place as an eventual rail line over turning it into a future bike trail.


They would never bother going through all of that hassle (if it was even feasible) for the handful of occasions they have to run out to Worcester.


If there are ever serious plans/funds for a North Station/Worcester connection this line would seem to make sense in many ways, though not likely to happen. An even more unrealistic connection would involve a spur from Weston off of B&A to old Central Mass which would connect to Fitchburg line all within nimby Weston. :wink:
NRGeep
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby Arborwayfan » Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:03 pm

It is not exactly NIMBYISM to get to like having a bike trail. I ride to work on one and would not like to see it torn up. (Little risk of that, since it the Pennsy and the NYC were parallel and Conrail took the best of each> NYC from Indy to Terre Haute and Pennsy to at least Effingham.) Bike trail users are different from NIMBYS (who often don't like bike trails either); actual busy bike trails become part of a conflict over the use of a right of way. NIMBYS sometimes use the idea of a bike trail to get rid of a rail line, but a successful bike trail builds its own actual support. In most places it's not a problem.
Arborwayfan
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:27 am
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby EuroStar » Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:40 am

I did not say that bike trails are a problem, just that there is no example of one going back to rail. And while NIMBYs might not like bike trails, practically all of them will defend bike trails over the alternative of trains coming back (diesels will be claimed too noisy and electric will be deemed too disruptive to the greenery around).
Last edited by CRail on Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Unnecessary quote removed.
EuroStar
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Middle of Nowhere

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby NRGeep » Fri Jun 29, 2018 11:39 am

Weston until last year balked at converting Central Mass line into bike trail.
Last edited by CRail on Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Unnecessary quote removed.
NRGeep
 
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby BandA » Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:11 am

That's Westons' choice. They can build bike trails next to roads like they do in several parts of town. There is a need for the Central Mass ROW as either CR or other form of motorized transportation because the highway was never built from 495 to 128. If two towns build bike paths but the town in between doesn't, that town has to figure out what to do with the bike riders who will now be riding in their streets!!
User avatar
BandA
 
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby Rockingham Racer » Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:18 am

By "highway", do you mean I-290?
Last edited by CRail on Sat Jul 07, 2018 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Unnecessary quote removed.
User avatar
Rockingham Racer
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:25 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby Area4 » Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:27 pm

Is B721 back? Not seen it at the usual times.

GP40MC1118 wrote:The Readville Switcher was supposed to be the first move today, but never materialized.

CSX is not due to start until next Sunday.

D
Area4
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:00 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby GP40MC1118 » Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:43 am

B721 is still on duty at 130pm Sunday-Thursday at Framingham. They didn't run this past
Sunday, but were around their usual time Monday.

D
GP40MC1118
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Grand Junction Branch (The North/South Side Connection)

Postby BandA » Tue Jul 10, 2018 1:35 pm

Rockingham Racer wrote:By "highway", do you mean I-290?
Yes, I-290 or MA 200. Basically US-20 can't handle the load even with the series of bypasses that have been built piecemeal. But this topic is for north-south transportation rather than east-west!
User avatar
BandA
 
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Previous

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lord Mkaiba, orange1234 and 4 guests