Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby BandA » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:39 pm

When I was riding, I would get up out of my aisle seat and offer the standee the middle seat, then sit back down in the aisle seat. If I knew the car was going to be full or more I would try to get one of the +2 seats on the other side.

Goal should be enough cars to run 2+2 seating with few or no standees, level boarding and automatic doors. Then the dwell time is reduced.
User avatar
BandA
 
Posts: 2585
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby RenegadeMonster » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:36 am

Car 828 is in need of a bit of maintenance.

The trucks underneath were making a lot of noise navigating curves and moving in a very jerky stick / give fashion that shook the car. This can't be good for their longevity. Is lubrication part of routine maintenance?


Also, one of the seats on 828 had purple tap on it. 5 pieces wide and 2 feet long. If a seat was damaged that badly why7 not replace?
RenegadeMonster
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby MBTA3247 » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:30 pm

The tape was probably put on by S&I. They won't be able to replace the seat until the next time the car visits BET or Readville for an inspection.
"The destination of this train is [BEEP BEEP]" -announcement on an Ashmont train.
User avatar
MBTA3247
 
Posts: 2701
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:01 pm
Location: Milton

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby RenegadeMonster » Mon Mar 26, 2018 8:44 am

Two massive pieces of artwork have appeared on 1819 over the weekend covering most of one side of the car including over the lower windows.

Passing by BET this morning I had to do a second take that that double decker wasn't one of those RDC's there was so much art work.

Such a shame.


How easily can the car be "untagged" when they preform the car body repairs at BET?
RenegadeMonster
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby sonicdoommario » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:59 pm

1827 seems to have come out of service for "carbody repairs."

Was it apparently tagged like 1819, as mentioned in the previous post?
sonicdoommario
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:14 pm

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby CRail » Sat Jan 05, 2019 8:55 pm

It lost its plow in a snowbank.
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).
User avatar
CRail
 
Posts: 2330
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 » Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:13 pm

CRail wrote:It lost its plow in a snowbank.


I thought they were suppose to fix that problem after the last incident a few winters back....
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:57 pm

Re: Rotem Cars Discussion (new bi-level cars)

Postby sonicdoommario » Mon Apr 01, 2019 6:14 am

The 1819 looks to be back in service, it was the lead car on the 702 this morning...
sonicdoommario
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:14 pm

Previous

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests