West Medford (and grade crossing) perceived inefficiencies

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: West Medford (and grade crossing) perceived inefficienci

Postby Arlington » Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:39 pm

Thanks to the mods for allowing the question about the crossing and its reflectivity to stand.

2) Are there visibility standards for the crossing-inserts?

Already answered:
1) No fence on Clearance Route
3) Rules for stations like W.Med in NORAC 121 (p46 & 47)
"Trying to solve congestion by making roadways wider is like trying to solve obesity by buying bigger pants."--Charles Marohn
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:51 am
Location: Medford MA (was Arlington MA and Arlington VA)

Re: West Medford (and grade crossing) perceived inefficienci

Postby BostonUrbEx » Fri Sep 28, 2018 6:23 pm

Arlington wrote:No fence on Clearance Route

There are fences at Wedgemere, Winchester, and Mishawum. However, measuring the space between tracks to the best of my ability on Google Maps, West Medford has less than 7ft (~6.5?) between the two tracks' inside rails, whereas the other three stations seem to have more than 7ft (~7.5?). Wyoming Hill has a similar track spacing but has a fence, but is not on a clearance route.
User avatar
Posts: 3835
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Winn to MPT 8, Boston to MPN 38, and Hat to Bank


Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests