2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderator: sery2831

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby octr202 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:18 am

octr202 wrote:Many issues on everything that isn't the Fitchburg Line up north this morning. 100 was cancelled out of Rockport (mech failure), and it sounds like two dead sets (50%!) at Bradford as well. Unknown whether one of them was healed, or a replacement set was sent up, but 206 appears to be cancelled, with a mixture of putting some people on the Downeaster (Haverhill), and also having 288 turn at Andover to cover there and Ballardvale. No idea what the poor souls at Bradford and Lawrence are supposed to do...


Further updates to the above, from the T'lerts;

-208 made it out of Haverhill in reasonable order, only to die between Bradford and Lawrence. Alerts now say an extra will "assist" it to Boston.

-201 died of unknown causes at Malden outbound. Alerts now say 289 will be used to shove it to Haverhill (and hopefully back again).
Wondering if I'll see the Haverhill double-tracking finished before I retire...
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010
User avatar
octr202
 
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:13 am
Location: In the land of the once and future 73 trackless trolley.

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby octr202 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:37 am

octr202 wrote:
octr202 wrote:Many issues on everything that isn't the Fitchburg Line up north this morning. 100 was cancelled out of Rockport (mech failure), and it sounds like two dead sets (50%!) at Bradford as well. Unknown whether one of them was healed, or a replacement set was sent up, but 206 appears to be cancelled, with a mixture of putting some people on the Downeaster (Haverhill), and also having 288 turn at Andover to cover there and Ballardvale. No idea what the poor souls at Bradford and Lawrence are supposed to do...


Further updates to the above, from the T'lerts;

-208 made it out of Haverhill in reasonable order, only to die between Bradford and Lawrence. Alerts now say an extra will "assist" it to Boston.

-201 died of unknown causes at Malden outbound. Alerts now say 289 will be used to shove it to Haverhill (and hopefully back again).



And in an update to the update, it now sounds like both 208 and 201 are limping along unassisted now.
Wondering if I'll see the Haverhill double-tracking finished before I retire...
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010
User avatar
octr202
 
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:13 am
Location: In the land of the once and future 73 trackless trolley.

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby Diverging Route » Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:05 pm

Dozens of T-Alerts this morning for south side issues, with some delays over an hour. Culprit is "Amtrak signal issues."
User avatar
Diverging Route
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:35 pm

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:52 pm

2017 and its air brake/computer were the issue on 706...messed up the morning rush hour on Franklin Branch. On the Corridor and Mainline, there was a broken rail on Track 2 at Hyde Park and dozens of track circuit issues, and switch problems at TRANSFER Int.
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:57 pm

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby Diverging Route » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:06 am

From T-Alerts, 304 died this morning at Wedgemere and had to be pushed in by 206. That caused rippling delays to 306, 307 and 312.
User avatar
Diverging Route
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:35 pm

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

Postby leviramsey » Thu Jan 19, 2017 8:41 am

410 (don't know the locomotive number) lost its HEP in Shirley. Also was stuck in the station for maybe 10 minutes.
leviramsey
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:12 pm

Previous

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests