Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby ConstanceR46 » Thu Nov 15, 2018 10:38 pm

i wish it was Doggeaux tbh
ConstanceR46
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:57 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby Mbtagp40mc » Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:14 am

So they've officially ridded themselves of 1009 and 1014. Will they do the same procedure with the rest or maybe sell them to tourist operations?.....or let's talk about restoration again... :P
Mbtagp40mc
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 3:47 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby Bramdeisroberts » Mon Nov 26, 2018 5:42 pm

I wonder how they'd look with MP-36 cabs and GEVO prime movers in the new HSP-46 paint scheme... *dodges tomatoes*
Bramdeisroberts
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:45 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby drvmusic » Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:49 am

Mbtagp40mc wrote:So they've officially ridded themselves of 1009 and 1014. Will they do the same procedure with the rest or maybe sell them to tourist operations?.....or let's talk about restoration again... :P


How many are left?
User avatar
drvmusic
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:12 am

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby GP40MC1118 » Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:45 pm

14 units stored.... 1009, 1014, 1016 scrapped.

D
GP40MC1118
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby CRail » Tue Dec 18, 2018 8:46 pm

15, don't forget the 1000.
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).
User avatar
CRail
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby trains18 » Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:01 am

Mbtagp40mc wrote:So they've officially ridded themselves of 1009 and 1014. Will they do the same procedure with the rest or maybe sell them to tourist operations?.....or let's talk about restoration again... :P


All of the screamers are officially retired. There is no rebuild program for them specifically. They are rotted to the core and have several points where it is leaking into their engine and HEP blocks to the point where it costs a lot more to rebuild them than retire and buy new locomotives. They are investing in 36 better shape F40s to be suitable for a rebuild program.
trains18
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:21 am

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby trains18 » Sun Feb 10, 2019 9:29 pm

As of recently, mbb coach 1514 was brought back into service for now from the Rochester storage line :)
trains18
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:21 am

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby CRail » Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:41 pm

trains18 wrote:All of the screamers are officially retired. There is no rebuild program for them specifically. They are rotted to the core and have several points where it is leaking into their engine and HEP blocks to the point where it costs a lot more to rebuild them than retire and buy new locomotives. They are investing in 36 better shape F40s to be suitable for a rebuild program.

Rotted to the core? They aren't solid blocks so I'm not sure how rot gets from the surface to the 'core'. The prime movers are EMD 645 Turbos just like any other F40 whether it be 2C, PH, M or otherwise. Assemblies for those engines are still commercially available from the manufacturer. The shells are sheet metal around a solid frame and the rest is all dressing. If those units got an overhaul the likes of the stretch F40s they'd come out just as good (minus the excess fuel consumption, which is really the disadvantage making them less feasible). If it wasn't for the head end power issue I'd say they're a lot more worthwhile than the GP40s, some of which are slated for Knowledge Corridor service (hence MassDOT ownership). Whatever plans are had for them may never be realized, but if there wasn't one I don't think any would still exist.
Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).
User avatar
CRail
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby trains18 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:46 pm

CRail wrote:
trains18 wrote:All of the screamers are officially retired. There is no rebuild program for them specifically. They are rotted to the core and have several points where it is leaking into their engine and HEP blocks to the point where it costs a lot more to rebuild them than retire and buy new locomotives. They are investing in 36 better shape F40s to be suitable for a rebuild program.

Rotted to the core? They aren't solid blocks so I'm not sure how rot gets from the surface to the 'core'. The prime movers are EMD 645 Turbos just like any other F40 whether it be 2C, PH, M or otherwise. Assemblies for those engines are still commercially available from the manufacturer. The shells are sheet metal around a solid frame and the rest is all dressing. If those units got an overhaul the likes of the stretch F40s they'd come out just as good (minus the excess fuel consumption, which is really the disadvantage making them less feasible). If it wasn't for the head end power issue I'd say they're a lot more worthwhile than the GP40s, some of which are slated for Knowledge Corridor service (hence MassDOT ownership). Whatever plans are had for them may never be realized, but if there wasn't one I don't think any would still exist.


Well keep in mind that if they wanted to rebuild them, they would have done that a long time ago before their lifespan is up. But yeah you never know if they change their mind to rebuild them. But as far as I've heard, they are retired and are awaiting the bids to be sold as scrap which is why they are in storage. There's lots of water that leaks into them because of the shell around them slowly rusting away and from staying outside uncovered which makes it more expensive to overhaul since there's more damage to repair. Some of their prime movers and other important components failed too not just the hep. The F40's currently in service are due for an overhaul which is being done now.
trains18
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:21 am

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby Mbtagp40mc » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:43 am

trains18 wrote:
CRail wrote:
trains18 wrote:All of the screamers are officially retired. There is no rebuild program for them specifically. They are rotted to the core and have several points where it is leaking into their engine and HEP blocks to the point where it costs a lot more to rebuild them than retire and buy new locomotives. They are investing in 36 better shape F40s to be suitable for a rebuild program.

Rotted to the core? They aren't solid blocks so I'm not sure how rot gets from the surface to the 'core'. The prime movers are EMD 645 Turbos just like any other F40 whether it be 2C, PH, M or otherwise. Assemblies for those engines are still commercially available from the manufacturer. The shells are sheet metal around a solid frame and the rest is all dressing. If those units got an overhaul the likes of the stretch F40s they'd come out just as good (minus the excess fuel consumption, which is really the disadvantage making them less feasible). If it wasn't for the head end power issue I'd say they're a lot more worthwhile than the GP40s, some of which are slated for Knowledge Corridor service (hence MassDOT ownership). Whatever plans are had for them may never be realized, but if there wasn't one I don't think any would still exist.


Well keep in mind that if they wanted to rebuild them, they would have done that a long time ago before their lifespan is up. But yeah you never know if they change their mind to rebuild them. But as far as I've heard, they are retired and are awaiting the bids to be sold as scrap which is why they are in storage. There's lots of water that leaks into them because of the shell around them slowly rusting away and from staying outside uncovered which makes it more expensive to overhaul since there's more damage to repair. Some of their prime movers and other important components failed too not just the hep. The F40's currently in service are due for an overhaul which is being done now.


Wouldn't they replace everything anyways? The -2c rebuilds are becoming -3c's which I believe would replace engine, prime mover, HEP, etc. The only thing that needs to be in ok enough shape is the frame which I imagine they would be. Seems to me if they get rid of the GP40's, they would need 1000-1017 (minus the ones scrapped already of course) to have a big enough fleet unless they plan on buying new or perhaps getting from Genesis's from Amtrak.
Mbtagp40mc
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 3:47 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby Backshophoss » Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:37 pm

That deadline at seaview has been exposed to salt water mist over time and the bodyshell sheet metal is rusting away,along with all the wiring inside
is corroded beyond use. The Main alternator would need to redone as would the HEP alternator,and the traction motors.
So the given is these F40's are scrap material,except for 1 unit to be stuffed and mounted at a museum if possible.
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 5764
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby trains18 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:56 pm

Wouldn't they replace everything anyways? The -2c rebuilds are becoming -3c's which I believe would replace engine, prime mover, HEP, etc. The only thing that needs to be in ok enough shape is the frame which I imagine they would be. Seems to me if they get rid of the GP40's, they would need 1000-1017 (minus the ones scrapped already of course) to have a big enough fleet unless they plan on buying new or perhaps getting from Genesis's from Amtrak.[/quote]

Yup the F40PHM and PH-2C's are becoming F4oPH-3C's getting everything replaced from top to bottom in and outside. But unfortunately for you the original F40's are getting retired. The metal is really rusted and corroded out and all the controls and parts inside cost more than it is to invest in better shape engines like the GP40's and the other F40's. The originals are the oldest and reached their lifespan. The Gp40's are getting their own repair contract so they will not be retired. 1118, 1132, 1136, and 1137 are currently getting rebuilt. Other GP40's might be in the repair contract, but we will see when that updates.
trains18
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:21 am

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby sonicdoommario » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:48 pm

Will the GPs still sound like standing 10 feet underneath a jet when rebuilt?

Also, would the rebuild F40s increase HP, or will that stay at 3,000?
sonicdoommario
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:14 pm

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

Postby Backshophoss » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:59 am

Believe the Geeps have Gen-set HEP units
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 5764
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests