LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.

Moderator: Liquidcamphor

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby Tommy Meehan » Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:56 pm

The dwindling ridership in the 1950s is in keeping with what happened with all the suburban passenger railroads, plus the subways and buses. They really got hammered during off-peak and weekends. If you go back and read the history, the War was over, the economy was booming and everyone had a new car. That was the story in the 1950s, people wanted to pile everyone into the car on weekends and go drive!

Long Island especially went car-crazy. Anyone remember the comedian Allan King? He used to have a whole routine about all the driving and drivers.

Then the LIRR had a couple of bad wrecks in 1950 and that must've hurt. Governor Thomas Dewey empaneled a NYS Commission to investigate the railroad -- that led to the Pennsylvania RR allowing the road to resume independent operation -- so there was an avalanche of bad publicity.

The MTA-LIRR have really done a great job in reversing this trend I think. The ridership was steadily increasing until the current recession hit and I'm sure will recover once the economy starts to grow again (which it seems to have begun to do).

I'd be willing to bet that once service to GCT starts in 2016 the railroad will gain many many new riders. If the Midtown Direct-Secaucus Transfer service is any indicator, I'd bet there will be a big big increase in offpeak and weekend ridership too.
User avatar
Tommy Meehan
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Yonkers

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby keyboardkat » Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:40 pm

Well, Tommy, you've left out the 12-year redevelopment plan under state law, 1954-1966, which brought about tremendous improvements in equipment and service. Under this plan, for twelve years the railroad paid no taxes; localities assumed the costs of maintaining stations, and there were to be no profits: Any surplus funds were required to be ploughed back into the railroad for improvements. Under the state car program, 222 new air-conditioned cars were bought (the P-72 and MP-72 fleet), later supplemented by the 30 air-conditioned American Flyer cars bought from the B&M; older cars were refurbished with improved lighting, seating and ventilation; maintenance was much improved as well. This resulted in the railroad achieving the best on-time record of any NY-area commuter road for several years running, and this was achieved with older cars and locomotives. There was some real pride in the railroad in those glory days. The Cannonball ran with an FM C-Liner on the point, an open platform observation on the rear, and a number of surpluss PRR heavyweight parlors, and new P-72 coaches in between.

As 1966 and the end of the plan approached, it became clear that the railroad could never be completely self-sustaining and thus could not return to private operation. This resulted in the creating of the MTA, then called the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority. Upon the state takeover, service deteriorated for a while as the new M-1 cars, bought without sufficient prototype testing, began laying down on the job.
Fairbanks-Morse forever!
keyboardkat
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: Ocean County, NJ

Re: LIRR's Ridership

Postby Tommy Meehan » Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:49 pm

keyboardkat wrote:Tommy, you've left out the 12-year redevelopment plan under state law, 1954-1966, which brought about tremendous improvements in equipment and service.


I didn't leave it out keyboard, I was responding to Tim's finding that, at least according to Moody's Manual for Investors, ridership fell by close to 30% during the Fabulous Fifties.

timz wrote:1962 Moody's says 69.1 million in 1961-- that's the newest I have at home. You'd think the enormous increase in population would more than balance out the parkways and LIE, but apparently not.


I guess Tim could've added, you would think the 12-year redevelopment plan would also have balanced out the ridership drain but it apparently didn't. It helped LIRR hold onto riders, I'm sure, but sadly the overall decline continued.

That's why I didn't mention it. :)
User avatar
Tommy Meehan
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Yonkers

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby timz » Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:11 pm

118.9 million in 1929, 118.2 in 1930. Less in 1924 and 1926.
timz
 
Posts: 1715
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Oakland CA

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby M&Eman » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:37 pm

Resurrecting an old thread here. Peak LIRR ridership was in the 1920s before the IND Queens Boulevard Line opened. Service within Queens was at essentially rapid-transit like levels and the riders that would soon switch to the subway were still using LIRR trains.
"The Erie only sells 1 way tickets on the NJ&NY because it only has a 99 year lease on the line."
User avatar
M&Eman
 
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:53 pm

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby ekm » Tue Nov 27, 2018 6:41 pm

Can anyone tell me where to find the old ridership records for the LIRR for the 20s, 30s, 40s documented?
ekm
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 1:45 am

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby Kelly&Kelly » Fri Nov 30, 2018 2:17 pm

I have them. What specifically do you need and for what purpose?
Kelly&Kelly
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:50 am

Re: LIRR 's Highest Ridership?

Postby nyandw » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:46 pm

Kelly&Kelly wrote:I have them. What specifically do you need and for what purpose?


I would put them in a table with perhaps a bar/line graph to go with it for the website. Let me know. Thank you.
User avatar
nyandw
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:41 am

Previous

Return to Long Island Rail Road (LIRR)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: scopelliti and 4 guests