The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.

Moderator: Liquidcamphor

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby EuroStar » Fri May 26, 2017 7:24 am

The first strings of rail were pulled through some of the tunnels under the yards (I think tunnel D) in Queens this past week. Of course, we are very very far from being able to run something on them, but it is a milestone.
EuroStar
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Middle of Nowhere

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby jlr3266 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:16 pm

The Westbound Bypass Shield was designed by the Contractor.
jlr3266
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:32 am

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby EuroStar » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:53 am

It appears that the Westbound bypass has hit a major snag. They appear to have been unable to resume construction with the tunnel shield. At this point it begs the question whether they should not just look into a temporary reroute of some sort and digging up the short tunnel the conventional cut and cover way. That will be disruptive, especially to Amtrak, but frankly, at this point it appears to me that the jacked shield is hopeless.
EuroStar
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Middle of Nowhere

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby SwingMan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:02 pm

Just to be clear on this:

The bypass was going to go under the existing Line 4 and 2 from North to South to allow Amtrak trains the ability to not mingle with LIRR trains? And the trench between F and Harold was part of it, correct?
SwingMan
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:52 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby Head-end View » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:45 pm

Does anyone here know what the problem is with the shield? And can it be described in layman's terms?
Head-end View
 
Posts: 2479
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: The second row on a SEPTA Silverliner V

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby lpetrich » Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:08 pm

MTA starts laying track for long-awaited East Side access for LIRR commuters -- some positive news.
The $10-billion project has been plagued by repeated delays and is tentatively set to open in late 2023.

Officials on Monday said the project is now 72% completed and that 13-and-a-half miles of track will eventually be in place.
lpetrich
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:09 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby mkm4 » Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:19 am

and that 13-and-a-half miles of track will eventually be in place.

I would hope so. :wink:
mkm4
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:14 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby zhaos » Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:02 pm

A very important expose on high construction costs was published by the Times this week. Front page article.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/nyre ... .html?_r=0

I feel like the public is helpless to deal with the issues highlighted, which is really unfortunate.
zhaos
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby NIMBYkiller » Tue Jan 02, 2018 12:36 am

I read a few pages back that the absolute max height of the tunnel fits an M1/M3/M7 and that's it. What is that height of the tunnel? Also, the question about Hell Gate tracks being able to access ESA; let's just assume 30 years from now they can design a car that can run NH and fit ESA, can those Hell Gate tracks physically access the ESA tracks. I don't need the questions
why and other "in-what-idiotic-scenario" remarks, I'm just curious if the two could physically connect.
NIMBYkiller
 
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Port Washington

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby quad50cal » Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:20 am

NIMBYkiller wrote:I read a few pages back that the absolute max height of the tunnel fits an M1/M3/M7 and that's it. What is that height of the tunnel?


The cross section of the overall tunnel structure is a 40' square. Don't know a more precise number than that.

Pic related: the prefabricated tunnel sections being built at a Maryland shipyard.
Image
Image

Edit: Happened to come across the answer in a document linked by DutchRailnut in the Siemens Charger Locomotives thread. A height of 13'-6" is listed in the appendix which seems to be very low for a 40' square.

http://www.highspeed-rail.org/Documents ... 1-6-15.pdf
User avatar
quad50cal
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:15 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby lpetrich » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:25 am

Checking on MTA | Capital Programs East Side Access, the quarterly report is up to Q3 2017, and there is an overall report that came out on Dec 11, 2017.
  • CM006 - Manhattan North structures - should be done by now.
  • CM007 - GCT Caverns - permanent walls, internal structures, tracks - 25% done, 2020
  • CM014A - LIRR Concourse and Facilities Fit-Out - should be done by now.
  • CM014B - LIRR Concourse and Facilities Fit-Out - behind schedule, should be done by 2020
  • VM014 - Vertical Circulation - elevators and escalators partially done
  • CQ032 - Plaza Substation and Queens structures - should be done by now.
  • CQ033 - Harold Midday Storage Yard - should be done by 2020
  • CH061A, FHA61A, FHL61A - Harold Track A Cut-and-Cover structure - 30%, should be done by midyear
  • FHA01 - Harold Stage 1 (Amtrak) - one track switch to go, should be done by midyear
  • FHA02 - Harold Stage 2 (Amtrak) - should be done by late this year
  • FHL01 - Harold Stage 1 (LIRR) - needs to switch over to new substation, should be done by early this year
  • FHL01 - Harold Stage 2 (LIRR) - lots of trackwork, should be done by 2020
  • CS179, CS084 - Systems - should be done by 2020
Looking at the critical-path diagram on PDF page 18 of the quarterly report, the strongest one is through the Harold trackwork. The biggest bit of it on that path is CH058A: B/C Approach Structures, and that will start at the beginning of next year. It is scheduled to be done at the end of 2020. The other two paths go through the midday yard and the systems works, and they also should be done a little bit before then. Then about 3 months of testing and revenue service should start. However, the construction planners have budgeted an extra 2 years for further schedule slippage, giving a target of the end of 2022.
lpetrich
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:09 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby mkm4 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:33 am

quad50cal wrote: A height of 13'-6" is listed in the appendix which seems to be very low for a 40' square.

You forget. The subway uses the top half of the tunnel.
mkm4
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:14 pm

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby Head-end View » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:47 pm

I'll take a guess that back in the late 1960's when this tunnel was being designed, it was thought that nothing higher than a subway car or the soon-to-arrive new M-1 cars would ever use this tunnel. Although LIRR still had "double-decker" electric cars at that time, everyone involved must have thought that the M-1's were the whole future of the LIRR East River Tunnels. And dual-mode loco's pulling bi-level cars thru to Manhattan wasn't even thought of until the 1990's, at least 25 years after the 63rd St. tunnel was built. I guess the designers needed a better crystal-ball. LOL :-D
Head-end View
 
Posts: 2479
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: The second row on a SEPTA Silverliner V

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby jlr3266 » Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:28 pm

That is correct. In fact, the brochures for the new tunnel had concept art of the proposed M1 vehicles are the lower level and proposed R40 slants on top.
jlr3266
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:32 am

Re: The East Side Access Project Discussion (ESA)

Postby BuddR32 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:12 am

And both of those fleets are retired before the full vision was attained! Still a cool image though.
BuddR32
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:14 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Long Island Rail Road (LIRR)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gamer4616, Norton and 4 guests