Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainline

Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby newpylong » Sun Apr 23, 2017 12:19 pm

BandA wrote:
newpylong wrote:No one operates over legally abandoned track. Are you sure it just wasnt out of service? Or owned by NH?
What would happen if they did? It wouldn't make much sense, but suppose some outfit was desperate for temporary storage space after an abandonment.


Probably nothing until they put one on the ground.
newpylong
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby NHV 669 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:30 pm

Not sure if this belongs here or in the NECR thread, now that they cover operations on this line. Was driving to visit my mother in Lebanon village, and took Maple Street out of Hartford/WRJ to reach NH Rt. 10. Hoppers were visible to end of track, near the Four Aces Diner. I took a poke around, without attempting to tresspass or leave my vehicle. Noticed that the HQ on the Westboro side, now with a corporate G&W sign, identifies the "yard" as the "Granite State Transload". A few other hoppers around, no sign of power other than the old Geep 1907, still lettered for CCRR tacked to the end of a few hoppers. This is a dead unit? if I'm not mistaken. Plenty of tanks over at the tank farm, Rymes? seems to be doing a good stroke of business at the moment.

Closer to Lebanon, drove past the underpass seen here https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6393086,-72.2664093,3a,75y,192h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sK5Apb9-7XCTmpx5wLYUZ1w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DK5Apb9-7XCTmpx5wLYUZ1w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dsearch.TACTILE.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D192.05876%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

and it seems the trail folks have worked quickly. Fully paved trail, and the underpass has a solid set of pressure treated rails on it. Trail is paved up until the ROW disappears under the tunnel here:https://www.google.com/maps/@43.6416272,-72.2552584,3a,75y,45.2h,102.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sE2FVBwPj-qGQUXSUoUMjOw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Casey
Living near right-of-ways since 1989. Old haunts include: childhood sightings of 669 being the last to "de-rust" the Berlin branch, late 90's summers trackside at the Wagon Wheel of Biddeford, ME, White River Junction, VT, Oneonta, NY, Colorado Springs, CO, and Santa Barbara, CA.
User avatar
NHV 669
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Location: Just east of Scott Jct. on the Mountain Division

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby Allouette » Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:02 am

The transload at Westboro handles road salt (hoppers) and propane (tank cars, may be operated by Rymes). Usual power is the larger of the two Trackmobiles. One can occasionally be seen at the site of the former CV roundhouse in White River Jct. The GP9 was a CCRR engine, and may have been dead before NECR took over. I haven't seen it move in over a year.
Allouette
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:07 am
Location: Plainfield NH

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby newpylong » Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:28 am

Scuttlebutt is they're looking to decommission the CTC on the Northern mainline.

I guess it makes sense given the lack of traffic - the T would need to replace it all anyway for passenger service.
newpylong
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby johnpbarlow » Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:11 am

Article in today's Nashua Telegraph: "Griffin: Freight service in N.H. a must for economy". Peter Griffin is New Hampshire Railroad Revitalization Association President.

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/local-news/2018/10/19/griffin-freight-service-in-n-h-a-must-for-economy/

Commentary from Pan Am Railways Executive Vice President Cynthia Scarano:
“The (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) has certain rights to provide commuter rail service on the line to Concord, provided that the MBTA is willing to make the initial rehabilitation investment and provide the necessary annual subsidy to support the service,” Scarano said via email. “As a result, if the MBTA elected to utilize its rights and make the necessary investment, Pan Am would work cooperatively with them on a plan to implement such service.”...
and...
“As the Downeaster has shown, New Hampshire has historically been adverse to investing in passenger rail, particularly the ongoing subsidies,” she said.
johnpbarlow
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:50 pm

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby NRGeep » Fri Oct 19, 2018 9:11 am

johnpbarlow wrote:Article in today's Nashua Telegraph: "Griffin: Freight service in N.H. a must for economy". Peter Griffin is New Hampshire Railroad Revitalization Association President.

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/local-news/2018/10/19/griffin-freight-service-in-n-h-a-must-for-economy/

Commentary from Pan Am Railways Executive Vice President Cynthia Scarano:
“The (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) has certain rights to provide commuter rail service on the line to Concord, provided that the MBTA is willing to make the initial rehabilitation investment and provide the necessary annual subsidy to support the service,” Scarano said via email. “As a result, if the MBTA elected to utilize its rights and make the necessary investment, Pan Am would work cooperatively with them on a plan to implement such service.”...
and...
“As the Downeaster has shown, New Hampshire has historically been adverse to investing in passenger rail, particularly the ongoing subsidies,” she said.


Not so subtle way of stating that PAR would not stand in the way of Massachusetts tax payers footing the bill for upgrading ROW to Concord NH. Wouldn't be shocked if some NH legislators would attempt to block this in the name of auto free dumb...
NRGeep
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: Freight Operations on the "Northern" New Hampshire Mainl

Postby backroadrails » Fri Oct 19, 2018 9:09 pm

As far as the removal of the signals, they did the same thing on District 1 from Clinton, ME to Hermon, ME. It will most likely will be the removal of the signal heads. Up here they capped the wires when they removed the signals and left the masts. The signal heads are sitting in storage at Waterville in case they need to reinstalled.
backroadrails
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:36 am

Previous

Return to Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests