Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby CN9634 » Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:18 pm

WN&P wrote:http://www.pressherald.com/2016/03/17/ngl-withdraws-contentious-propane-depot-plans-in-south-portland/

as predicted NGL moves on



I say Westbrook off the old Mountain.
CN9634
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:50 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby MEC407 » Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:43 pm

How 'bout this:

FedEx just bought the old J.J. Nissen plant in Biddeford, which has a siding off the main. FedEx won't be using the siding. FedEx leases the siding and the railcar loading/unloading area to NGL. Would be a win-win.
MEC407
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives
User avatar
MEC407
 
Posts: 10669
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:15 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby gokeefe » Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:00 pm

Cowford wrote:Remind me again why Maine ranks as the worst state in the nation in which to do business?


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.
gokeefe
User avatar
gokeefe
 
Posts: 9683
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby Cowford » Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:11 pm

That has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is simply a classic case of New England nimbyism.


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


In other words, "Maine's not the worst, the whole region is like this!"
Cowford
 
Posts: 2667
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby fogg1703 » Sat Mar 19, 2016 6:54 am

gokeefe wrote:Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


Well short of the small fact that NGL was forced into a sale by the State of Maine for the IMT expansion and then left out to dry by the same state and local leadership when it came to finding a new site at Rigby. A blind eye after Maine got what they wanted isn't exactly what I would call friendly.
fogg1703
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby newpylong » Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:01 am

Cowford wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is simply a classic case of New England nimbyism.


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


In other words, "Maine's not the worst, the whole region is like this!"


Yes, if it's not white collar most up here don't want it.
newpylong
 
Posts: 3921
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby F-line to Dudley via Park » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:32 am

newpylong wrote:
Cowford wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is simply a classic case of New England nimbyism.


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


In other words, "Maine's not the worst, the whole region is like this!"


Yes, if it's not white collar most up here don't want it.


Not every town in Massachusetts is like this...but, whoo boy, way way too many of them scream exactly the same shrill note. The STB filings are flying left and right about that New England Transload thing on the Woburn Loop spur.
F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Posts: 7100
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: North Cambridge

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby MEC407 » Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:23 am

fogg1703 wrote:
gokeefe wrote:Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


Well short of the small fact that NGL was forced into a sale by the State of Maine for the IMT expansion and then left out to dry by the same state and local leadership when it came to finding a new site at Rigby. A blind eye after Maine got what they wanted isn't exactly what I would call friendly.


That seems like it's probably a pretty accurate assessment. NGL was, apparently, perfectly happy on West Commercial Street and probably wouldn't have had any reason or desire to leave if the state hadn't forced them to. The question is, did the state choose the Rigby site for them, or help them choose Rigby, or did NGL come up with that all on their own? Either way, one can't ignore that this whole thing was bungled from the very beginning. The ordinance against new large scale fuel storage in South Portland goes back 20+ years and wasn't a secret to anyone. How they (NGL, the state) missed that is beyond me. Don't they have well-staffed, well-funded legal departments who are capable of reading a town's Code of Ordinances?

I wish them luck in finding a suitable site. It shouldn't be that hard. There must be close to a half dozen industrial-type sites with sidings off the main between Portland and Wells.
MEC407
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives
User avatar
MEC407
 
Posts: 10669
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:15 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby gokeefe » Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:31 am

Cowford wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is simply a classic case of New England nimbyism.


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


In other words, "Maine's not the worst, the whole region is like this!"


I think there are many many places across the entire country that are like this ... I can imagine plenty of places, especially in densely populated areas where these facilities are difficult to find sites for.

The one thing NGL has going for them in this situation is the abundance of underused industrial properties all over the area. They will find something just not in South Portland.
gokeefe
User avatar
gokeefe
 
Posts: 9683
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby leviramsey » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:05 pm

gokeefe wrote:
Cowford wrote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is simply a classic case of New England nimbyism.


Portsmouth did everything South Portland did and then some.


In other words, "Maine's not the worst, the whole region is like this!"


I think there are many many places across the entire country that are like this ... I can imagine plenty of places, especially in densely populated areas where these facilities are difficult to find sites for.


Well, New England's tradition, going back to the 17th century, of a high degree of local autonomy gives NIMBYs a lot more tools for their arsenal. In places where the primary layer of local government is the county, it's a lot harder for the folks in a particular set of backyards to NIMBY things.
leviramsey
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:12 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby Bulkheadflat » Wed May 04, 2016 11:46 am

Surveillance cameras have now been installed throughout Rigby yard, and additional lighting as well. I'm assuming this is due to the rapidly growing intermodal traffic we're now seeing, but am not certain. The last yard camera I can remember was a large one on the east side of the yard by the old clean-out tracks in the 90's, and was told back then that it had been out of use for a long time by that point.
Turners Island has been loaded with cars lately, saw a line of at least 10 open-top high sided black hoppers in there last week, with quite a few others sitting in the sidings behind the neighborhood, busy place these days!
Bulkheadflat
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby MEC407 » Wed May 04, 2016 1:49 pm

Glad to hear about the new cameras. The old cameras were OOS for a loooooong time. I first heard about them in '99 or 2000, and was told they'd been broken "for quite a while" at that point... so we're talking probably 20+ years now.
MEC407
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives
User avatar
MEC407
 
Posts: 10669
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:15 pm

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby Z31SPL » Wed May 04, 2016 1:51 pm

Don't get too excited, the new ones are probably only for show and not even hooked up :-D
Z31SPL
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:44 am
Location: Kingston, NH

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby newpylong » Wed May 04, 2016 2:03 pm

The ones in Deerfield stopped working in the early 90s when the yard switches went from remote controlled to manual throw. The Guilford way. Did Rigby have any remote switches too?
newpylong
 
Posts: 3921
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Rigby Yard — Activity, Sightings, and General Discussion

Postby pnolette » Wed May 04, 2016 2:40 pm

newpylong wrote:The ones in Deerfield stopped working in the early 90s when the yard switches went from remote controlled to manual throw. The Guilford way. Did Rigby have any remote switches too?


Rigby had power switches at both ends of the yard and on the leads when PT Tower was active.Everything went manual when the tower was closed.
Peter B&MMEC
pnolette
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Maine

PreviousNext

Return to Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests