Sale of the Ft. Wayne Line to NS

Discussion related to the operations and equipment of Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail) from 1976 to its present operations as Conrail Shared Assets. Official web site can be found here: CONRAIL.COM.

Moderators: TAMR213, keeper1616

Sale of the Ft. Wayne Line to NS

Postby Engineer Spike » Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:04 pm

I know that CR had shifted most of its traffic to the old NYC. Why didn't they just rip up the old PRR, or even shortline it? It seems strange that it would be sold to the top competitor. The NKP was roughly parallel anyway.
"Welcome all ye who enter; the show that never ends. Tingfield Sperminal Railway." (Graffiti on the entry to Mohawk Yard Office)
Engineer Spike
 
Posts: 1645
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 3:24 pm

Re: Sale of the Ft. Wayne Line to NS

Postby charlie6017 » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:35 pm

I wonder if part of Conrail keeping that line had to do more with the PAX operations than anything. If
I remember right, Amtrak still ran the "Broadway" via Ft. Wayne until around 1990 or so and also there
was a shuttle between Valparaiso, IN and Chicago back and forth at least on the weekdays. It seems after
the Broadway was re-routed that's when CR downgraded the line and deactivated the signals, etc.

So that makes me assume CR was getting dollars elsewhere (AMTK, et al) to keep this line intact as
long as they did.

Charlie
~Charlie Ricker
User avatar
charlie6017
 
Posts: 3035
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: Rochester, New York

Re: Sale of the Ft. Wayne Line to NS

Postby CPF363 » Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:04 pm

Surprising that Conrail did not look to retain the Chicago-Logansport-Columbus line verses the Fort Wayne line as it is not as parallel to the NYC Water Level Route and would have kept Columbus more on a through line between Indianapolis and Pittsburgh with Buckeye Yard in the middle. This would have allowed traffic from Pittsburgh to run to St. Louis through Buckeye Yard then on to the Panhandle joining the Big Four at Union City instead of going through Cleveland.
CPF363
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: Sale of the Ft. Wayne Line to NS

Postby Matt Langworthy » Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:56 pm

Conrail was looking to reduce redundant trackage. Your scenario is interesting from a railfan's perspective, but CR was able to eliminate a good chunk of the Panhandle with the routing they chose.
Matt Langworthy

"It is highly likely that the 1990s were an overrated decade."
User avatar
Matt Langworthy
 
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Rochester, NY


Return to Conrail - 1976 to the Present

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests