Vermont Activity and Sightings

Discussion of present-day CM&Q operations, as well as discussion of predecessors Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway (MMA) and Bangor & Aroostook Railroad (BAR).

Moderator: MEC407

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby NHV 669 » Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:45 am

Recent photos by Kevin Burkholder show the newly-repainted 3812 around Newport, and heading through the "tunnel" to Columbia Forest products. Not sure if they're still letting the WACR handle it as needed.

Speaking of the photographer and 3812, here's a drone shot from Lyndonville last Friday as NPWJ picks up four cars at CTI:
http://www.railpictures.net/photo/613863/

They left town with 38 cars, including a bunch of loaded centerbeams, so there was certainly a need to borrow CMQ power.

Another photo by Kevin, as the train heads just south of Passumpsic, VT:

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/613864/
Casey
Living near right-of-ways since 1989. Old haunts include: childhood sightings of 669 being the last to "de-rust" the Berlin branch, late 90's summers trackside at the Wagon Wheel of Biddeford, ME, White River Junction, VT, Oneonta, NY, Colorado Springs, CO, and Santa Barbara, CA.
User avatar
NHV 669
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Location: Just east of Scott Jct. on the Mountain Division

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby mkittredge » Wed May 03, 2017 3:59 pm

If I had not been there to see all this, I would not have believed it. On Monday May 1st I ventured to Richford. 710 arrived with 31 cars at 13:45 with a striking array of power: 6537, 3815 and 2540. All three units returned to Farnham with 18 cars and I think they were all empties. That left 3812 with 31 cars and I think they were all loads to move to Newport. They pulled the first 15 off and headed for Newport at 15:10. They failed to get up the hill heading out of North Troy so they halved the train again and proceeded to Newport. 31 cars had become only seven. That is when I said enough and headed back to St. Johnsbury. Three units with a light train and one unit with a heavy train and steep grades. What a way to run a railroad!

Mike
P.S.: Nice shots Casey!
mkittredge
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:48 pm

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby csx2039 » Thu May 04, 2017 11:38 pm

Yes they are a joke, loosing business to pan am because their rates are too high and transit times are too long. Recently a customer had to shut their mill down as they ran out of product while thier super hot loads sat on Cmq tracks waiting for 7 days only 30 miles from said mill. And as of today customer still has not received cars. You ask any of the big wigs up in Maine they are just full of excuses and don't give a crap anywho.... And that's why they are loosing traffic.
csx2039
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 8:27 pm

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby csx2039 » Thu May 04, 2017 11:40 pm

mkittredge wrote:If I had not been there to see all this, I would not have believed it. On Monday May 1st I ventured to Richford. 710 arrived with 31 cars at 13:45 with a striking array of power: 6537, 3815 and 2540. All three units returned to Farnham with 18 cars and I think they were all empties. That left 3812 with 31 cars and I think they were all loads to move to Newport. They pulled the first 15 off and headed for Newport at 15:10. They failed to get up the hill heading out of North Troy so they halved the train again and proceeded to Newport. 31 cars had become only seven. That is when I said enough and headed back to St. Johnsbury. Three units with a light train and one unit with a heavy train and steep grades. What a way to run a railroad!

Mike
P.S.: Nice shots Casey!

It would help if the Canadians would make more then 2 trips every 7 days to Vt...
csx2039
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 8:27 pm

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby dustybroe » Fri May 12, 2017 1:17 am

i was Richford Monday and Yesterday both Newport to Richford Trains had 23 Cars. both 710 15 cars Monday Also yesterday i talked to John the conductor on 710, he told me more traffic is increasing. more on the Newport Sub. he also Stated CMQ is going Start Replacing 4,000 ties On Newport Sub in Vermont and in Canada, due to More Bigger heaver trains on Newport sub. in Future. he Said also there talking about increasing service on Newport sub.
dustybroe
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:06 am

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby NHV 669 » Sat May 13, 2017 12:13 pm

Northbound traffic headed to CMQ seems light, based on consistent WACR reports by Fritz, perhaps this is more traffic (lumber?) coming south? Trains are apparently daily/as needed, (as opposed to the previous M/W/F) and most seem to be close to at least 10 cars, if not a few more on a more consistent basis.
Casey
Living near right-of-ways since 1989. Old haunts include: childhood sightings of 669 being the last to "de-rust" the Berlin branch, late 90's summers trackside at the Wagon Wheel of Biddeford, ME, White River Junction, VT, Oneonta, NY, Colorado Springs, CO, and Santa Barbara, CA.
User avatar
NHV 669
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Location: Just east of Scott Jct. on the Mountain Division

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby Dick H » Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:06 pm

Report on another list that the WACR (VTR) power went south
with just light power both of the last two days. Apparently,
CMQ was a no show at Newport.
Dick H
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Dover, NH

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby csx2039 » Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:43 pm

Expect much more of this in future, cmq only running one day this week. Mondays only. Terrible railroad for vt customers and connections. Absolutely terrible.
csx2039
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 8:27 pm

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby dustybroe » Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:59 am

I wont Be Surpised to See Vermont Rail System take over the Newport Sub.
dustybroe
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:06 am

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby Dick H » Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:26 pm

Two issue on the VTR taking over the Newport sub. First, that would require
operating into Canada. Secondly, the VRS only owns the ex D&H line from
Rutland to Whitehall. Maybe some sort of lease agreement. I do not see
the state of VT purchasing the Newport sub.
Dick H
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Dover, NH

Re: Vermont Activity and Sightings

Postby F-line to Dudley via Park » Mon Jul 31, 2017 9:29 pm

Dick H wrote:Two issue on the VTR taking over the Newport sub. First, that would require
operating into Canada. Secondly, the VRS only owns the ex D&H line from
Rutland to Whitehall. Maybe some sort of lease agreement. I do not see
the state of VT purchasing the Newport sub.


Those are kind of moot, because the bankruptcy court agreement that transferred MMA's assets to CMQR stipulated that the system had to remain fully intact for 10 years. CMQR is prohibited from partitioning any of itself without prior approval from the courts that such moves would be in the best interests of the ex-MMA territories. So any ownership moves affecting the makeup of the inherited railroad would require re-petitioning the bankruptcy court for approval under the terms of the original settlement. Even ones as inocuous as CMQR just selling the Newport Sub ROW under their feet to VTrans and flipping to trackage rights with zero change in ops. Certainly something as basic as that wouldn't raise any concerns with the court, and would also tap some new state-level funding sources through VTrans' responsibility to maintaining its asset. They might even be compelled to do a VRS sale if that demonstrably showed win-win service improvements on the sub, or a partial territorial outsource that moved the interchange from Newport to Richford or Cowansville so VRS could catch CMQR running slightly more frequently.

But there's also no compelling reason now to go to all the trouble of reopening the bankruptcy settlement for a multi-national company for something as relatively small as that. The revenue at stake isn't worth the lawyers or paperwork in dotting all i's and crossing t's with the courts, when they can just wait another 7 years for the system preservation clause to expire and slice-and-dice the system any which way they please. Running in Canada is no biggie for VRS. They deal with Canadian tarriffs 24/7 with all its CP and G&W Canadian Gateway entanglements, as well as the St. Lawrence Seaway port traffic they handle on the separate NY & Ogdensburg reporting mark. Actually running into Canada to chase some minor net-positive addition to their bottom line isn't a very big leap for a company that already is so Canada-dependent on traffic sources. It fits their general business mold, so I don't think border-crossing red tape is going to deter them if they see strategic value in chasing it. But again...why go to the trouble of going before the bankruptcy court and pushing a lot of paper to get their blessing to amend the MMA preservation clause? Just wait 7 years. That's why there's not going to be any transfer of control of the Newport Sub in the near-future: too much easier to just wait 7 years to be able to negotiate mano-a-mano rather than having to lard on a bunch of extra lawyers to petition the courts.


Also figure, by waiting 7 years there'll be a resolution on the owner/operator staring contest over the St. Johnsbury-Gilman portion of the Mountain Div. Twin State's/Lamoille Valley's trackage rights agreement with Pan Am expires on 12/31/2018 unless representatives of Lamoille Valley's deceased owner's estate voluntary step forward to claim the 10-year carrier-option extension of those rights to 2028. If nobody from the estate steps forward to explicitly file for the extension, Pan Am (or most likely PAR dumping the track on VTrans) will be able to put the trackage rights back out to bid in as little as 17 months. State aid for considerable track rebuilding notwithstanding, VRS may have an easier path bidding their way east of St. Johnsbury and through NHCR territory into an eventual interchange with SLR. And they may not have to count carloads to make it worth their while to pursue that move, as the mere threat of a second Northern VT Class III interchange may be all it takes to light a fire under CMQR to stiffen up its Newport service levels and "fix the glitch" so-to-speak without VRS needing to buy its way across the border at all. So why dispatch lawyers before an international court to amend the MMA system preservation agreement now when it's less than 2 years before they know if they have the option to open-bid on Gilman, and only another 5 years after that before that 10-year preservation clause expires and they can make a deal directly with CMQR. Any way you slice it, it's a wait-and-see and not a situation where instant gratification is going to work to anyone's benefit. VRS is better off running out the clock on these time-limited agreements--both the MMA system preservation clause and the "keep CMQR honest" threat of a potential SLR interchange--and letting those expiration dates work to their competitive advantage rather than acting impatiently because CMQR...today...is providing underwhelming service to Newport. There's a lot more chess moves to play by waiting for some expiration dates to pass on various legal entanglements and seeing if that loosens up their options.
F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Posts: 7105
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: North Cambridge

Previous

Return to Central Maine & Quebec Railway (formerly Montreal, Maine & Atlantic / Bangor & Aroostook)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests