Illinois Amtrak Service

Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, Amtrak67 of America, Tadman, gprimr1

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby njt/mnrrbuff » Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:53 pm

I must say for many years, there has been a lot of wasted opportunity for Amtrak in Illinois with speeds. Once the corridors leave the outer suburbs served by Metra behind, then there is so much potential to have the trains doing 110 mph. I know that down the road, Amtrak will be running at 110 mph for about 75 percent of the route between Chicago and St. Louis. Much of the 110 mph operation will be south of Joliet as the right of way is very dead straight in many spots and the stops are more spread out.

Cities like Aurora and Joliet are both about 40 miles from Downtown Chicago and when you are traveling on any Amtrak train heading west of Joliet and Aurora, suburban landscapes are taken over pretty fast by miles and miles of farmland.
njt/mnrrbuff
 
Posts: 3255
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby dowlingm » Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:35 am

eolesen wrote:And yet the dual presence isn’t the cause of failure.... unlike the rest of the train-culture countries, the US is made up of large yet geographically dispersed population centers. Illinois is the size of Ireland, and just about as rural once you get outside of Dublin.

If Ireland doesn’t need high speed rail, we don’t. Most long distance travel there is by bus...

Comparing Illinois to Ireland would be like putting a state line roughly at the level of Peoria. Also putting Chicago where I-74 enters Indiana and Springfield where Chicago is. Oh also it wouldn't be a state line but an international border with different signalling regulations (ATP vs CAWS).

There are *five* trains a day from STL-CHI. There are trains every hour from 0700-1900 leaving Dublin (city pop 520k) for Cork (city pop 120k) over a rail distance of about 160 miles. There are 5x daily services to other places even smaller. The difference being, of course, that the passenger rail operator owns and dispatches the tracks.
dowlingm
 
Posts: 1152
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:42 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby daybeers » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:24 pm

This project is certainly a boondoggle. I might even call it a waste of taxpayer money. How have taxpayers benefited? They haven't, only UP has.

The fact that some of you still refer to 110 mph MAS as "high-speed rail" is utterly ridiculous. It's 2019, which means it's even a stretch to call above 125 (and not 150) high-speed.

Let's face it: the way the U.S. goes about its infrastructure projects borders on a scam. Hope is at the end of the tunnel, with public-private partnerships becoming more common and the overhaul of rolling stock regulations, but we're rumbling through that tunnel in a 10 mph freight train instead of a 150 mph streamlined passenger train.
daybeers
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:13 pm

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby NealG » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:33 pm

dowlingm wrote: There are trains every hour from 0700-1900 leaving Dublin (city pop 520k) for Cork (city pop 120k) over a rail distance of about 160 miles. There are 5x daily services to other places even smaller. The difference being, of course, that the passenger rail operator owns and dispatches the tracks.


Not to mention, faster speeds and newer (presumably more lightweight) equipment. I took Iarnród Éireann from Dublin to Cork last fall and clocked the train I was on at between 105 and 110 mph regularly along the way. The service was quick, reliable, and presumably popular, seeing that an 11 AM train (with at least six cars) out of Dublin's Heuston Station maintained about 75% occupancy along much of the route.
NealG
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:39 am
Location: Waltham, MA

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby Tadman » Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:04 pm

Given the amount of abandoned ROW we have in Illinois (and any east-of-Mississippi population center) it's probably time to stop giving freight lines money for upgrades or even trackage rights and pony up for some abandoned mainlines. Is it worth immediately converting the entire network? Probably not. But the concept has worked reasonably well on the Michigan lines, and would work better if (a) we let a private party run the passenger trains over the ROW; (b) quit pretending the NW Indiana situation isn't the stupidest thing in passenger rail (IE where there are 2 parallel gov't funded passenger corridors within spitting distance).

How it is that the state didn't pony up for one of these lines when they had the money (which they sure don't anymore) is beyond me, other than the idea that we all thought passenger trains were going away until 2002-ish.
User avatar
Tadman
 
Posts: 9063
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:21 am

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby eolesen » Tue Mar 12, 2019 9:12 pm

Two thoughts --

1) Chances are those abandoned corridors don't typically go between population centers on a preferred alignment
2) Building on an empty ROW would be many, many more times more expensive than upgrading existing, and that doesn't include the cost of maintaining it in perpetuity...

Illinois can't even afford rolling stock for its state-owned transit agency... Building out a new railroad alignment ain't gonna happen in any of our lifetimes.
eolesen
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:01 am

Re: Illinois Amtrak Service

Postby mtuandrew » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:25 pm

Given that high-speed passenger service on the Alton was a condition of the UP-SP merger, do Illinois or Amtrak have any recourse to either force compliance, or trigger a sale (a la Amtrak v B&M on the lower Conn River)?
User avatar
mtuandrew
 
Posts: 5345
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

Previous

Return to Amtrak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests