Acela Disposition Discussion

Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, Amtrak67 of America, Tadman, gprimr1

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby ApproachMedium » Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:33 pm

mtuandrew wrote:My prediction:

—RRMPA gets a full set
—another museum gets a full set, but I don’t know which
—a third and fourth museum get a power car and passenger car each
—we all get surprised by some unlikely operator grabbing four sets of cars to use behind diesels, non-tilting
—all the rest go to the tin can factory.



These things will never be behind diesels because of the couplers and nonstandard vestibule connections as well as many many more non standard things with car body ends, HEP, and internal car controls. These cars DO NOT work 100% without the power cars attached at either end. The cost to make any such modifications would most likely far exceed the cars value. Any chance that a museum would want a power car and a single car would need to either take two power cars so it can be moved around or have some kind of turntable so the end with no power car is not a problem. They do not exhibit normal draft gear boxes so swapping the draw heads out with regular couplers cannot happen. Also another problem here is these sets have a complicated braking system that has a parking brake on every car. once air runs out, the parking brakes apply unless its electrically applied from the power cars. With them dead, to get one to move you need to know how to properly release them or you will drag axles.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
ApproachMedium
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: From here to There

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby mtuandrew » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:31 am

ApproachMedium wrote:These things will never be behind diesels because of the couplers and nonstandard vestibule connections as well as many many more non standard things with car body ends, HEP, and internal car controls. These cars DO NOT work 100% without the power cars attached at either end. The cost to make any such modifications would most likely far exceed the cars value. Any chance that a museum would want a power car and a single car would need to either take two power cars so it can be moved around or have some kind of turntable so the end with no power car is not a problem. They do not exhibit normal draft gear boxes so swapping the draw heads out with regular couplers cannot happen. Also another problem here is these sets have a complicated braking system that has a parking brake on every car. once air runs out, the parking brakes apply unless its electrically applied from the power cars. With them dead, to get one to move you need to know how to properly release them or you will drag axles.

I didn’t say any of the museum pieces would ever be operational :P

As for operators, I’m picturing either a low-rent tourist line that will barely even have lights on let alone tilt, or possibly a luxo-train willing to install a HEP generator in an end coach and switch out the end drawbars for Type H couplers. No serious daily railroad will be applying.
User avatar
mtuandrew
 
Posts: 5491
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby ApproachMedium » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:10 pm

mtuandrew wrote:
ApproachMedium wrote:These things will never be behind diesels because of the couplers and nonstandard vestibule connections as well as many many more non standard things with car body ends, HEP, and internal car controls. These cars DO NOT work 100% without the power cars attached at either end. The cost to make any such modifications would most likely far exceed the cars value. Any chance that a museum would want a power car and a single car would need to either take two power cars so it can be moved around or have some kind of turntable so the end with no power car is not a problem. They do not exhibit normal draft gear boxes so swapping the draw heads out with regular couplers cannot happen. Also another problem here is these sets have a complicated braking system that has a parking brake on every car. once air runs out, the parking brakes apply unless its electrically applied from the power cars. With them dead, to get one to move you need to know how to properly release them or you will drag axles.

I didn’t say any of the museum pieces would ever be operational :P

As for operators, I’m picturing either a low-rent tourist line that will barely even have lights on let alone tilt, or possibly a luxo-train willing to install a HEP generator in an end coach and switch out the end drawbars for Type H couplers. No serious daily railroad will be applying.



The end draw bars cant be swapped out. And these things get hot inside REALLY FAST without the HVAC. and the HEP isnt really standard either. Well, it is 3 phase 480 but the cable set up is different.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
ApproachMedium
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: From here to There

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby DutchRailnut » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:29 pm

other than front coupler on power cars I believe all other couplers are not at standard height , And Kadee does not make offsets large enough.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22129
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby mtuandrew » Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:53 pm

*applause* :-D Hopefully other potential buyers heed the warning. I don’t actually want or need to see these rolling after they’re done at Amtrak, I’m just pondering what others might do.
User avatar
mtuandrew
 
Posts: 5491
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby ApproachMedium » Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:42 pm

if the 4 HHP-8s that are set out to pasture and not going anywhere (lease ran out) is any indication of the future of any of that junk im fairly certain its none.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
ApproachMedium
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: From here to There

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby george matthews » Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:18 pm

French TGV trains are much lighter than Acelas - and much faster. American rules, which produce very heavy trains, make them unsaleable almost everywhere.
george matthews
 
Posts: 4814
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:07 am
Location: Britain

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby Tadman » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:36 pm

Another thing to consider about sale to developing nations:

Most developed nations building advanced HST are in a position where they have excess capacity and government backing, which makes their HST similar to our defense industry. It is sold on very favorable terms to friendly developing nations. Recently, France sold a TGV system to Morocco and financed half of it to the tune of $1b. Although it's not HST, China sold quite a lot of suburban trains to Argentina on very favorable terms.

Why would any developing nation want our barbaric lead-balloon HST with 20 years on the odometer if they can get the best HST brand new and interest-free?
User avatar
Tadman
 
Posts: 9213
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:21 am

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby ApproachMedium » Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:06 am

The latest fleet summary plan says they will be retired and does not mention anything of keeping them other than full replacement.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
ApproachMedium
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: From here to There

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby R36 Combine Coach » Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:16 pm

ApproachMedium wrote:These things will never be behind diesels because of the couplers and nonstandard vestibule connections as well as many many more non standard things with car body ends, HEP, and internal car controls. These cars DO NOT work 100% without the power cars attached at either end. The cost to make any such modifications would most likely far exceed the cars value.
How much did VIA spend to convert LRC to regular coaches?
Since my friend continues to chain smoke nonstop, she is probably an Alco.
User avatar
R36 Combine Coach
 
Posts: 5338
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:51 pm

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby ApproachMedium » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:39 pm

I dont know but the LRC cars were already pretty much regular coaches the acela cars are far more complicated electrically and mechanically.
No good deed goes unpunished.
User avatar
ApproachMedium
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: From here to There

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby Backshophoss » Sun Apr 07, 2019 1:06 am

The LRC coaches and food service cars were built as standalone cars,only way the tilt mech worked was only with the LRC Alco power cars.
In corridor service,and the tilt mech gear removed,are pulled with Via's F40's and P42's,in mixed consists with HEP-2 cars.
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 5950
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: Acela Disposition Discussion

Postby Matt Johnson » Sun Apr 07, 2019 2:42 pm

Backshophoss wrote:The LRC coaches and food service cars were built as standalone cars,only way the tilt mech worked was only with the LRC Alco power cars.
In corridor service,and the tilt mech gear removed,are pulled with Via's F40's and P42's,in mixed consists with HEP-2 cars.


Actually I understand that when the P42's were acquired by VIA, they were configured to work with the LRC tilt mechanism (I presume they had to feed data back to the first coach?). But with the most recent LRC coach rebuild, the active tilt was disabled/removed. Bottom line - the LRC tilt mechanism was used for quite a number of years but ultimately deemed not worth it.
User avatar
Matt Johnson
 
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Hazlet, NJ

Previous

Return to Amtrak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], michicc, WhartonAndNorthern and 4 guests