PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, Amtrak67 of America, Tadman, gprimr1

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby electricron » Sat Dec 22, 2018 9:06 am

bostontrainguy wrote:With this big an order, maybe Amtrak could get Siemens to throw in aerodynamic noses.


For most long distance trains, Amtrak usually runs two locomotives on the front end coupled together in the elephant arrangement (nose to tail), at least over America's great mountain passes. So having hoses and cable connectors easily accessible is more important to Amtrak than it is Brightline, which is why Amtrak wants a non-aerodynamic nose.
electricron
 
Posts: 4450
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby SRich » Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:24 am

Is that still necessary when 1 charger produce 4400 kW ?
Greatings from the Netherlands
User avatar
SRich
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 11:19 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby Tadman » Sat Dec 22, 2018 11:14 am

BNSF requires a third unit in winter for the Builder as a protection issue.
User avatar
Tadman
 
Posts: 9066
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:21 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby Matt Johnson » Sat Dec 22, 2018 11:37 am

electricron wrote:
For most long distance trains, Amtrak usually runs two locomotives on the front end coupled together in the elephant arrangement (nose to tail), at least over America's great mountain passes. So having hoses and cable connectors easily accessible is more important to Amtrak than it is Brightline, which is why Amtrak wants a non-aerodynamic nose.


VIA's units seem to have a more aerodynamic nose sans coupler shroud based on the drawings, but eh, not a huge deal either way. I am a little curious to know how easy these will be to repair after the inevitable grade crossing collisions.
User avatar
Matt Johnson
 
Posts: 4141
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Hazlet, NJ

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby bostontrainguy » Sat Dec 22, 2018 11:50 am

electricron wrote:
bostontrainguy wrote:With this big an order, maybe Amtrak could get Siemens to throw in aerodynamic noses.


For most long distance trains, Amtrak usually runs two locomotives on the front end coupled together in the elephant arrangement (nose to tail), at least over America's great mountain passes. So having hoses and cable connectors easily accessible is more important to Amtrak than it is Brightline, which is why Amtrak wants a non-aerodynamic nose.


This info was recently posted on another website for what it's worth:

Trains that can operate with one locomotive:

-- California Zephyr (Chicago to Denver)
-- Capitol Limited
-- Cardinal
-- City of New Orleans
-- Crescent
-- Lake Shore Limited
-- Piedmont
-- Silver Star
-- Silver Meteor
-- Texas Eagle

Trains needing two locomotives:

-- California Zephyr (Denver to Sacramento)
-- Coast Starlight (northern part)
-- Empire Builder
-- Southwest Chief


Poster also mentioned that the new very reliable Chargers might be capable enough to allow Amtrak to convince host railroads to drop the backup locomotive requirement.
bostontrainguy
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:14 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby chuchubob » Sat Dec 22, 2018 12:31 pm

SRich wrote:Is that still necessary when 1 charger produce 4400 kW ?

That's 4400 HP, 3300 kW.
chuchubob
 
Posts: 6045
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: South Jersey

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby Matt Johnson » Sat Dec 22, 2018 12:36 pm

chuchubob wrote:
SRich wrote:Is that still necessary when 1 charger produce 4400 kW ?

That's 4400 HP, 3300 kW.


Or a mere 200 hp more than a P42.
User avatar
Matt Johnson
 
Posts: 4141
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Hazlet, NJ

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby DutchRailnut » Sat Dec 22, 2018 12:49 pm

except the charger has AC propulsion and gets far more out of that 4400 hp.
a P42 in HEP mode is only 3800 hp max minus its hep load due to reduced rpm.
the charger will produce hep no matter what rpm so uses entire range of speed and HP.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
DutchRailnut
 
Posts: 22060
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby east point » Sat Dec 22, 2018 2:23 pm

If I was a freight RR would require to always have at least 2 locos pulling trains. Do not need a broken down passenger train in the middle of the boonies with no road access on single track section ! Even around here no matter how short a train CSX always has at least 2 locos pulling consist !
east point
 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby bostontrainguy » Sat Dec 22, 2018 2:56 pm

east point wrote:If I was a freight RR would require to always have at least 2 locos pulling trains. Do not need a broken down passenger train in the middle of the boonies with no road access on single track section ! Even around here no matter how short a train CSX always has at least 2 locos pulling consist !


Don't know where "around here" is, but "down here" (Florida) CSX is now running incredibly long trains with just one locomotive.

I have read many reports that Amtrak is doing whatever it can to cut trains to only one locomotive. The most recent is removing the baggage car from the Boston section of the Lake Shore Limited.
bostontrainguy
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:14 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby frequentflyer » Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:14 pm

Matt Johnson wrote:
electricron wrote:
For most long distance trains, Amtrak usually runs two locomotives on the front end coupled together in the elephant arrangement (nose to tail), at least over America's great mountain passes. So having hoses and cable connectors easily accessible is more important to Amtrak than it is Brightline, which is why Amtrak wants a non-aerodynamic nose.


VIA's units seem to have a more aerodynamic nose sans coupler shroud based on the drawings, but eh, not a huge deal either way. I am a little curious to know how easy these will be to repair after the inevitable grade crossing collisions.


Yeah, split the differnce between the state's pug nose and Brightline's beak and get the Via nose with a functioning front coupler.

https://www.railwayage.com/wp-content/u ... harger.jpg
frequentflyer
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:28 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby Alex M » Sat Dec 22, 2018 9:22 pm

You can add the palmetto as a LD train using only one locomotive.
Alex M
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 10:22 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby bostontrainguy » Sat Dec 22, 2018 10:08 pm

Matt Johnson wrote: VIA's units seem to have a more aerodynamic nose sans coupler shroud based on the drawings, but eh, not a huge deal either way. I am a little curious to know how easy these will be to repair after the inevitable grade crossing collisions.


Absolutely! Much better looking and a great compromise.
Attachments
VIASiemensCharger.jpg
bostontrainguy
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:14 am

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby John_Perkowski » Sat Dec 22, 2018 11:06 pm

Admin note:

Unless you’re a corporate officer of Amtrak, and/or unless Amtrak offers a contest for the final paint scheme, you’re not getting a vote in how these locomotives will look at delivery.

Let’s move along, please.
~John Perkowski: Moderator: General Discussion: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Equipment
Assistant Administrator: Railroad.net/forums
Please don't feed the spammers! If you see spam, please notify a Moderator
User avatar
John_Perkowski
 
Posts: 4735
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:12 pm
Location: Off the Q main near Parkville MO

Re: PURCHASE ORDER For New Locomotives

Postby mtuandrew » Sun Dec 23, 2018 1:30 am

The closer it can be to the ACS-64 the better, so the Amtrak Charger and Sprinter fleets can share some body components.
User avatar
mtuandrew
 
Posts: 5353
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

PreviousNext

Return to Amtrak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests