RFP for new locomotives

Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, gprimr1, Amtrak67 of America, Tadman

Re: RFP for new locomotives

Postby mtuandrew » Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:45 pm

Could. They’d have to find a new prime mover/s (maybe the MTU 4000?) but the TRAXX does come in DC, AC, and dual-mode flavors. Not sure about tri-mode.
User avatar
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

Re: RFP for new locomotives

Postby DutchRailnut » Mon Jul 09, 2018 5:27 pm

guys obviously have not read posted specification post with rebuttal from manufacturers.
http://www.highspeed-rail.org/Documents ... 1-6-15.pdf
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
User avatar
Posts: 21813
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: RFP for new locomotives

Postby frequentflyer » Thu Dec 06, 2018 11:36 am


From Nov. meeting-

- Charger Updates from States and Amtrak – In October, Chairman Curtit requested summary updates on the Chargers now that they have been placed in service.

Updates provided on 10-23-18:

a. Illinois/Mid-West States:

Jennifer Bastian reported that the overall equipment delivery and performance of the new Charger Locomotives has been the best she has seen. She noted that it is her understanding that it has exceeded Amtrak’s expectations.

Operationally, it has been a good procurement.

One area of concern, however, is warrantee support and parts availability. The Mid-West states are working with Siemens to correct this situation.

b. California:

Kyle Gradinger agreed with Jennifer that the procurement has been a good one operationally. Caltrans’ concerns are similar to those noted by IDOT – warrantee support – and parts availability. Overall, Kyle commented, - “operationally, when they are running, they work great”. He added that engineers enjoy the cab and the acceleration is great – “overall we are very happy with the operation.”

Kyle did mention that there are some glitches with the design of the snow plow – noting that California doesn’t need a snow plow and it is ultimately used for shopping carts and tumble weed which can be problematic under the current design.

c. Amtrak:

Charlie King, Amtrak, echoed the comments made by California and IDOT and noted that Amtrak is measuring the information closely and looking at availability of parts and overall warranty support.

Charlie added that “we need robust part support from Siemens and technical support as well…we need to partner with Siemens and need a good and tight relationship between the states and Siemens and Amtrak, the states and Siemens.”

So the Chargers are surpassing expectations, the engineers love the acceleration and California has a problem with the plow (?)
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:28 am

Re: RFP for new locomotives

Postby frequentflyer » Thu Dec 06, 2018 11:38 am

And this-

"Status Update: Metro North Dual Mode Locomotive Procurement as of 11-20-18:

Metro-North has canceled its Dual Mode Locomotive procurement for now. When it went on the street, it was assumed that the purchase of the new equipment was to be with 100% state funding. Circumstances have changes and Metro-North will re-issue the RFP with appropriate federal clauses and with the use of federal funds.

Status Update: Amtrak Locomotive Procurement – 11-20-18:

Amtrak is still working on the process to make the selection on the Locomotive procurement and is continuing to work on developing the RFP for cars."
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:28 am

Re: RFP for new locomotives

Postby njt/mnrrbuff » Thu Dec 06, 2018 4:17 pm

MNR’s dual mode power is still in good shape but I don’t like the acceleration. At least, the majority of MNR platforms are high level and the dual modes are typically only used on express trains. They do show up on the semi express trains to Croton Harmon.
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm


Return to Amtrak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ryand-Smith and 12 guests