Concrete vs Wood Ties

General discussion about railroad operations, related facilities, maps, and other resources.

Moderator: Robert Paniagua

Re: concrete vs. Wood Ties

Postby sd80mac » Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:30 am

pennsy wrote:They are also evaluating Composite Plastic ties. Anyone have any information on that ?


Conrail had 10 plastic ties, which came from recycle, in 10 different locations (not sure if it was a bunch of ties in 10 different location or one tie for each location). They laid them just right before NS and CSX fought over CR... I dont believe that they completed their research/evaluating on these plastic ties. No news or word on what NS/CSX had done with these plastic ties.
sd80mac
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Rochester, ny

Re: concrete vs. Wood Ties

Postby TedBell » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:12 am

lpetrich wrote:Interestingly, the older lines of some recent light-rail systems have wooden ties, while just about all their newer lines use concrete ties.

I checked on Portland, Sacramento, San Jose, Los Angeles, San Diego, Salt Lake City, Denver, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Dallas, Hudson-Bergen, and Baltimore.


UTA (Salt Lake City) uses wood ties at several switches. I still wonder why composite ties aren't used. The technology must have improved considerably, and I believe the costs are lower than concrete.
User avatar
TedBell
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:43 pm
Location: Salt Lake City

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby scharnhorst » Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:41 am

Concrete ties are vary popular in Europe on there main lines while wood ties are mostly used on branch lines and industrial tracks and yards there. In some parts of Africa Steel ties are still common to see as well.
no matter the weather or the country I'll still be trackside!
scharnhorst
 
Posts: 2999
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK, Syracuse, NY - Kherson, Ukraine

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby JWilson » Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:06 pm

Wood ties, and even timbers, can be replaced by hand. Replacement of concrete ties requires the use of machinery. Concrete ties must be cribbed out deeper to allow the bolsters to pass under the rails thus requiring more tamping. Concrete "timbers" are unique in their size and placement of bolsters: ie a "timber" marked L64 can only go into position 64 and then only on a left hand switch whereas wood timbers can be used in different locations limited only by their length.
JWilson
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:54 pm

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby Backshophoss » Thu Feb 13, 2014 9:33 pm

Herzog Uses Concrete ties where they can,on mainlines,sidings and yard tracks.
they only use Wood ties on switches.
Backshophoss
 
Posts: 4507
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby Passenger » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:01 am

scharnhorst wrote:Concrete ties are vary popular in Europe on there main lines while wood ties are mostly used on branch lines and industrial tracks and yards there. In some parts of Africa Steel ties are still common to see as well.


Easier to ship the steel ties in from elsewhere than cut down trees in Africa?

What's the benefit?
Nonsense is nonsense, but the history of nonsense is a very important science.
User avatar
Passenger
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 3:08 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby David Benton » Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:00 pm

I believe steel ties are predominately used in areas where termites are a problem. Instead of wood ties .
Moderator worldwide railfan , Rail travel & trip reports
The only train trips I regret are the ones I didn't take.
User avatar
David Benton
 
Posts: 7804
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:29 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Concrete vs Wood Ties

Postby railfan1928 » Mon May 15, 2017 4:25 pm

Concrete is good for passenger rails, wood for freight, because as someone else mentioned, concrete cracks under the weight. It is about as good as wood for the most part, but it costs more, so it has never caught on. Plastic composite ties are the future, and we are very close to finally having a de-facto winner in that category that should be adopted by the Class Is. I would give it five years until major orders go through. It will be interesting to see which tie makers survive until then. Axion is currently the leader, I think.
railfan1928
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 4:42 pm

Previous

Return to Operations, Facilities, Maps and Resources

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests