CBTC train to train?

General discussion about railroad operations, related facilities, maps, and other resources.

Moderator: Robert Paniagua

CBTC train to train?

Postby CLamb » Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:40 am

All that I've read of CBTC speaks of systems where the trains have bidirectional communication with a central location. Are there any where the trains communicate train to train to enforce distance restrictions?
CLamb
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ

Re: CBTC train to train?

Postby BostonUrbEx » Sun Sep 06, 2015 12:16 am

I don't know what CBTC actually stands for, but I've seen it tossed around before. Different forms of signaling confused me/I don't fully understand the differences between them.

However, to answer your question: yes. It is called a moving block system, but I don't know what the technical name is nor what the acronym for such a system is.
User avatar
BostonUrbEx
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Winn to MPT 8, Boston to MPN 38, and Hat to Bank

Re: CBTC train to train?

Postby rovetherr » Mon Sep 07, 2015 3:44 pm

CBTC stands for Communications Based Train Control, or PTC for dark territory. I have only heard of systems that "talk" between the field and the base, due to the vastly increased level of complexity introduced by having field to field comm that must also be mirrored to the base in an effort to avoid unexpected situations in the field (overlap authorities, misaligned switches, so forth)

CBTC utilizes moving blocks, but they are also part of any non-signaled authority system that utilizes Track Warrants, Form D's, or whatever the RR chooses to call them. Instead of a series of defined block limits that do not change, and whose use can be somewhat restrictive when multiple trains and/or MW personnel are introduced to a single line, moving block allows the dispatcher to define the limits of each train/foreman's authority, be it 60 miles, or 1/4 mile, as needed to fit the operational needs of the given moment.

EDIT! Forgot about the last part of the question about any current systems that use train to train comm to establish authority. GCOR allows "Radio Blocking", which sets up communication between two trains, one following the other, and allows the leading train to call clear of locations to the following train, instead of dealing with the dispatcher. Not sure about NORAC, I haven't had that class in awhile and I forget if something similar is allowed. The RR I work for doesn't allow radio blocking, we usually don't have enough traffic on any one line at one time to justify the added expense of another form, or the added level of risk from partially pulling the DS out of the mix.
paddy
DSLE to the stars!
My RR pics
Jack Donaghy wrote:I'm already not liking some of these people, reminds me of being on the bus
rovetherr
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:15 am
Location: Still on the wrong side of the tracks


Return to Operations, Facilities, Maps and Resources

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests