Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New Jersey

Moderator: David

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pumpers » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:23 pm

RichM wrote:It's an interesting situation.

How many cars would need to be generated to justify the line improvements, even if it is to operate at 10 mph from Palisade Avenue north? Lots of crossings and traffic light synchronizing circuits to reactivate, some ballasting, tie and rail work, including restoring the run-around in Closter... in 2018 dollars, all in has to be at least $2-3 million.

I'm guessing, but my back of the envelope says there would look to be at least 20-30 car loadings a week, and that would have to come on quickly... maybe 3 runs a week north of Englewood to justify reactivation. Trains could operate off-hours to avoid delaying some cross traffic in Tenafly and Closter, but not late at night without incurring opposition based on noise.
...

Suppose the 30 loads are three 10-car trains per week. At 10 mph, that's about one minute for the 10-car train to go by. Doesn't sound to me like a big deal from a traffic perspective.
pumpers
 
Posts: 1980
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:56 pm

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby RichM » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:32 pm

Oh I wasn't saying it was impossible, really just trying to get a handle on whether it made any economic sense for CSX... I'm not sure how frequently they come up to Ridgefield and Englewood now... would they drop the existing cars and run north just with the locomotive and the gondolas or hoppers for the waste loadings?

Although I'd argue a little bit about the minute to pass... have to activate lights and if I remember correctly about 5-6 of the crossings had gates at one time... so make it three minutes! :-D
RichM
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:04 am

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby airman00 » Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:41 pm

As I understand the food oils place in Englewood, Supreme oil/Admiration foods gets service 5 days a week, M-F. If that’s still the case, then it shouldn’t be too hard to switch the oils plant and then leave the tank cars and run up north with the gondola or hopper cars. Having the former team track/run-around back in service would probably help with the switching operations, as you could bring the tankers up north with you and leave them on the run-around while you work the waste site.
User avatar
airman00
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pdtrains » Wed Dec 05, 2018 4:39 pm

There are no gates on the northern north of the main drag in Englewood. It wouldnt be too much trouble to re-arrange the mess that CR made north of Closter Dock Road, and put old track 1 back in between Closter Dock Road and the original north end of the double track. That will hold probably 25 cars, and wouldnt need to rebuild the 3 grade crossings thru town with 2 tracks. And the old Hercules Powder track ROW might still be there...that could hold another 10 empties, without cars being stored insight of downtown. (the rail might still be there, under the weeds and dirt, for all I know....)

Other considerations about this potential business...how long a haul will CSX get with outbound loads, and does CSX do other business with this C&D company.

Anyway...I'd love to see trains back up to Closter. Not holding my breath, but its a nice thought.
Attachments
el pax closter.png
pdtrains
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Phila, PA, Paso Robles, CA

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby cr9617 » Wed Dec 05, 2018 6:00 pm

If you're talking about this mess, it was CSX that did it. These images were taken right after it was finished.
Attachments
SCAN0127.JPG
SCAN0128.JPG
SCAN0121.JPG
cr9617
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:35 pm

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pdtrains » Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:04 pm

Yea, im talking about that mess. Sry. I stand corrected. It was such a cheap assed stupid way to change the tracks (imho)....I cuda sworn it was CR.
Seeing as flying switches ("Drops" as we used to say) are verboten these days, ya'd think they would put a runaround back in, if the traffic develops.
pdtrains
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Phila, PA, Paso Robles, CA

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby airman00 » Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:09 pm

I’ve seen that. The track alignment gets weird right by Dykes Lumber. Almost looks like three tracks went thru there? I always wondered how the original alignment went and why the change? I know Closter has a lot of old track and siding remnants still in existence. Two that come to mind are remnants of a siding by the Closter veterans memorial and remnants of a siding by the old freight house.
User avatar
airman00
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pdtrains » Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:55 pm

The dykes lumber switch used to be the north end of the double track. so they made the "diverging" move south to track one, the main, and then curved it back to connect with old main 2, and too rest of old main 1 OOS. The "3rd track" was part of the old JJ Demarest lumber siding...now Dykes lumber. The yard where they unloaded cars of lumber was served off a switchback that had a south facing switch on to main 2. The north end of the switchback tail track I believe originally went to a coal yard. The track by the old freight house was originally main 1. the pic i posted shows the train going from single track to main 1 and south end of Closter. The other track (now gone) that had a platform for unloading and held 2 cars...was last used by pascack valley stone. They werent the original user, tho...
pdtrains
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Phila, PA, Paso Robles, CA

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby ccutler » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:28 am

I am guessing that the new facility is being developed either
1. because rail has an ever-growing market share of C&D shipments, or
2. as a competitive move by CSX to capture shipments that now occur by the partially-NS-owned NYSW about 10 miles south of Closter.
Either way, the Northern Branch is now much more important to CSX, likely going from the to-be-divested list to the profitable operations list.
ccutler
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:17 pm

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pdtrains » Thu Dec 06, 2018 11:35 am

Im guessing that there is more going on than meets the eye here. They may want to also get dykes lumber back on board. Lumber from the west coast is a long haul for csx. So is C&D going south. And its only 4 miles up the road from Englewood. We are only talking about rehabbing 4 miles of track to 10 mph standards. 30 cars a week plus possible lumber isnt a bad haul. Especially if it going to your competitor right now.
pdtrains
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Phila, PA, Paso Robles, CA

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby airman00 » Fri Dec 07, 2018 7:36 pm

Now the question is where in Closter will this operation take place and will the second track be reactivated? I know for a fact the former Miele site, now owned by Interstate Waste Services, is across the street from where the main is. To reach their facility would require construction of a siding with a street crossing. The yard/lot down the street they use to store empty roll-offs is near housing if I remember so the noise, etc., might be a small issue. However in that lot is where the old Weyerhaeuser siding runs through so they could use part of that to load cars. Anyway IWS with it’s parent company Action Environmental Group seems big enough financially to support this kind of operation. So here is a link to IWS acquisition of Miele sanitation...
http://interstatewaste.com/about-iws/ne ... sanitation
(fair use quote)

http:Teaneck, NJ June 12, 2018 – The Action Environmental Group, provider of non-hazardous waste management and recycling services for New York City, Northern New Jersey, Rockland and Orange County, New York; today announced the completion of its acquisition of Miele Sanitation, a Bergen County, New Jersey-based waste management company.

With this transaction, The Action Environmental Group, through its subsidiary Interstate Waste Services (IWS), has acquired operations and assets of the Closter, NJ based company. The acquired business assets include commercial waste and recycling collection, equipment, and vehicles.//interstatewaste.com/about-iws/news-awards/209-action-environmental-acquires-miele-sanitation
User avatar
airman00
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby SecaucusJunction » Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:09 pm

Are we actually sure this is happening or is this just a Railpace rumor going wild.
I think it may be possible that NJ Transit might not be the perfect, infallible organization that most people assume it is.
SecaucusJunction
 
Posts: 3057
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 9:40 pm
Location: NS Watchdog

Re: Re-opening of northern part of Erie Northern RR

Postby pdtrains » Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:17 pm

According to the Railpace article...."In October, surprising news surfaced that CSX was planning to reactivate the line from Englewood to Closter..." - John Krattinger.

You can tell me if he is credible. Of course it could be BS.

I checked google earth. The part of the recycle company butts up against the main and the old weyerhaeuser lead (west side of the main) Using the Lead and part of the main, they could spot about 6 cars at a time for loading. There is room to put in a track where the old hercules powder siding was, too, for car storage. Storing cars on the main in that area not a great idea, as there is a steep downward grade going north. Looks like putting the old main1 train back as a runaround, north of Closter Dock Road, would be a good idea. I mean if this happens.

I'm just hopeful cause I lived in Closter for a long time, rode the last passenger train from Sparkill to Hoboken , have some of the records from the closter station, pix and movies of trains on the northern, and own the Closter station signs. :)
pdtrains
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Phila, PA, Paso Robles, CA

Previous

Return to New Jersey Railfan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest